Showing posts with label Xsquadder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Xsquadder. Show all posts

December 26, 2018

Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond.
"I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II
Sunhawk 2 days ago#2
What does that mean?

But it sounds good, i.e. not in XSquader's favour.
It has been days since something interesting happened.
Thrill me, chill me, fulfil me.
Is his court and legal drama for real?
u/homelessscootaloo
http://tinyurl.com/jk7uhjn
AlecSkorpio 2 days ago#4
The episode of Down The Rabbit Hole on Xsquadder is going to be a doozy
BeyondWalls 2 days ago#5
Sunhawk posted...
What does that mean?

It means that Dustin actually outsmarted a Judge with his stupid voice changer and “my girlfriend did it” tactics. 

They drug him in for violating the court order on using social media and the Judge actually sided with Dustin and said there was no proof it was him. 

Basically, Dustin won.
END OF LINE
Punished “Venom” Dawkins
IslamMD 2 days ago#7
40huh2U
Kevin Durant. Lord of the Warriors. Swisher of Hoops.
Garioshi 2 days ago#8
MwfcWNM
"I play with myself" - Darklit_Minuet, 2018
Zikten 2 days ago#9
he has some kind of super power that gets him to get away with things
LittleScootaIoo posted...
Is his court and legal drama for real?

Yes. This is 100% real and the court records are public
It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha."
https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv
Sunhawk 2 days ago#11
Sad. Does this mean he's not going to prison for the 3rd time?
It has been days since something interesting happened.
Thrill me, chill me, fulfil me.
YookaLaylee 2 days ago#12
I can't wait to see what happens in season 4
BeyondWalls posted...
Sunhawk posted...
What does that mean?

It means that Dustin actually outsmarted a Judge with his stupid voice changer and “my girlfriend did it” tactics. 

They drug him in for violating the court order on using social media and the Judge actually sided with Dustin and said there was no proof it was him. 

Basically, Dustin won.


Maybe the Judge just doesn't want the train wreck to end just yet.
Audio Theater: For discussion of podcasts, radio, audiobooks, and the like
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1364-
Master_Bass 2 days ago#15
SmidgeIsntBack posted...
BeyondWalls posted...
Sunhawk posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

It means that Dustin actually outsmarted a Judge with his stupid voice changer and “my girlfriend did it” tactics. 

They drug him in for violating the court order on using social media and the Judge actually sided with Dustin and said there was no proof it was him. 

Basically, Dustin won.


Maybe the Judge just doesn't want the train wreck to end just yet.

Damn CEmen judges.
Many Bothans died to bring you this post.
smoliske 2 days ago#16
Garioshi posted...
MwfcWNM

LMAO
EdgeMaster 2 days ago#17
Garioshi posted...
MwfcWNM


This kills me lmao
If you don't have anything nice to say, say it on the internet.
****poster Extraordinaire
LightningAce11 1 day ago#18
FursonaNonGrata posted...
Punished “Venom” Dawkins

Lol
"I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II
Laserion 1 day ago#19
All they have to do is have P say it was her, and let them compare her voice, if it was really her.
There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".
CM_Ponch 1 day ago#20
How
SW-8316-3213-4720
CM_Ponch posted...
How

Either Dustin is a criminal mastermind or the Maryland legal system really is as dumb as he claims.
END OF LINE
bover_87 10 hours ago#22
Laserion posted...
All they have to do is have P say it was her, and let them compare her voice, if it was really her.

They're not going to spend that much money doing a voice analysis for something this minor.
I...I shall consume. 
Consume...consume everything. ~ [FFRK] rcr6 - Chosen Traveler/Forbidden Power/Divine Veil Grimoire
Laserion 8 hours ago#23
bover_87 posted...
Laserion posted...
All they have to do is have P say it was her, and let them compare her voice, if it was really her.

They're not going to spend that much money doing a voice analysis for something this minor.

I meant just a normal by-ear comparison, nothing fancy like a police procedural show.
There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".
bover_87 19 minutes ago#24
They'd still have to call in an expert witness, which would be quite expensive. Just some rando saying it's the his voice isn't going to be enough if he used a voice modifier.
I...I shall consume. 
Consume...consume everything. ~ [FFRK] rcr6 - Chosen Traveler/Forbidden Power/Divine Veil Grimoire
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond.

January 9, 2018

Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched? 150 - 319

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
Gamer99z posted...
No, it was a total sucker punch. He didn't say "put up your dukes" first.


Even kids know to say that.




@2:50
cjsdowg 1 day ago#152
pikachupwnage posted...
Gamer99z posted...
No, it was a total sucker punch. He didn't say "put up your dukes" first.


Even kids know to say that.




@2:50


While I never saw that. Goku being a cool Gran dad. To make up for being a horrible father.
Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives?
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
If he wanted to fight then why did he want me to tell him what I said? It really doesn't matter if you are just going to fight anyways. That's why I figured he wanted to talk first.


This level of inability to interpret blindingly obvious implied meaning to written words must be some form of learning difficulty.
BronzeBraveAsiansmallclawedotter
Posted with GameRaven 3.3
Rika_Furude posted...
Kim Kusanagi posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)


Why dont you send him a cease and desist post

just just an entire post, he sent me a cease and desist topic once. glorious. he thinks he can sue us over words we type on gamefaqs.com lol


https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB969482165306581385

"Online Stock Message-Board Poster Is Sued for Defamation Over Statements"

https://deadspin.com/wmu-boosters-wife-sues-message-board-posters-over-fuck-1684191151

https://frankpetaluma.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/your-internet-posts-can-get-you-sued-for-defamation/

"As a general caution, I remind everyone to be generally aware of copyright laws as well as the general rules of libel when posting on the Internet…

It is one thing to dump on a public figure or public official, but the legal standards are quite different when it comes to private individuals or businesses.
If you don’t understand the difference, perhaps you should learn something about New York Times vs. Sullivan. (1)
Finally, be aware of SLAPP –as in “slap you down”– suits (2)

Above all, please keep in mind that posting under a screen name will not protect you.

"Anonymity’s cloak may be pierced by subpoena…

or a properly issued search warrant.

…It also may be lifted by the site administrator…"

http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/news/a43755/facebook-defamation-lawsuit/

etc.
Please don’t sue me sir, I take it all back. I’ll never do it again!
- literal garbage
16-BITTER 1 day ago#157
Defamation only applies when you're falsely tarnishing someone's good name and reputation.

If you don't have those things, they can't be tarnished.
The folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most.
16-BITTER posted...
Defamation only applies when you're falsely tarnishing someone's good name and reputation.

If you don't have those things, they can't be tarnished.

Can you even tarnish what's supposed to be an anonymous forum username?
21 days until Dawkins goes to jail for a few years? Can we have a count down thread?
MC_BatCommander  tell him to get over it1 day ago#160
16-BITTER posted...
Defamation only applies when you're falsely tarnishing someone's good name and reputation.

If you don't have those things, they can't be tarnished.


but he's a celebrated freedom fighter
The Legend is True!
16-BITTER 1 day ago#161
More of an instigator I think. Like Woody Woodpecker.
The folks who know about frostiness stay frostiest the most.
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
Kim Kusanagi posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

just just an entire post, he sent me a cease and desist topic once. glorious. he thinks he can sue us over words we type on gamefaqs.com lol


https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB969482165306581385

"Online Stock Message-Board Poster Is Sued for Defamation Over Statements"

https://deadspin.com/wmu-boosters-wife-sues-message-board-posters-over-fuck-1684191151

https://frankpetaluma.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/your-internet-posts-can-get-you-sued-for-defamation/

"As a general caution, I remind everyone to be generally aware of copyright laws as well as the general rules of libel when posting on the Internet…

It is one thing to dump on a public figure or public official, but the legal standards are quite different when it comes to private individuals or businesses.
If you don’t understand the difference, perhaps you should learn something about New York Times vs. Sullivan. (1)
Finally, be aware of SLAPP –as in “slap you down”– suits (2)

Above all, please keep in mind that posting under a screen name will not protect you.

"Anonymity’s cloak may be pierced by subpoena…

or a properly issued search warrant.

…It also may be lifted by the site administrator…"

http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/news/a43755/facebook-defamation-lawsuit/

etc.

I dont give two shits about your american law. Learn australian law please. Even if i were american i doubt your courts would give 1 single shit about your wuss ass crying over an internet post
The gamefaqs mods might support and enable you, but nobody in real life will
Posted with GameRaven 3.3
(edited 1 day ago)report
Conflict  refugee love block me1 day ago#163
How you gonna sue people on gamefaqs when you have literally no personal information about them
I want a 6ft amazon girl to uppercut my junk - SSJGrimReaper
literal_garbage posted...
Please don’t sue me sir, I take it all back. I’ll never do it again!


Dawkin's is going to sue us all :(.
he can find out through the gamefaqs server.
I'd hate to be that guy. he'll be dodging freak accidents for the rest of his life now. Final Destination rules - RickyTheBAWSE
(edited 1 day ago)report
He will never find me through 7 proxies
Posted with GameRaven 3.3
literal_garbage posted...
I’ll have you know that this is my real name

zWISPhT
Quintons fatass way back there. Homie cant keep his pants up. Tryna borrow a belt I'm like Nobody here wear size EQUATOR!!
Rika_Furude posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
 show hidden quote(s)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB969482165306581385

"Online Stock Message-Board Poster Is Sued for Defamation Over Statements"

https://deadspin.com/wmu-boosters-wife-sues-message-board-posters-over-fuck-1684191151

https://frankpetaluma.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/your-internet-posts-can-get-you-sued-for-defamation/

"As a general caution, I remind everyone to be generally aware of copyright laws as well as the general rules of libel when posting on the Internet…

It is one thing to dump on a public figure or public official, but the legal standards are quite different when it comes to private individuals or businesses.
If you don’t understand the difference, perhaps you should learn something about New York Times vs. Sullivan. (1)
Finally, be aware of SLAPP –as in “slap you down”– suits (2)

Above all, please keep in mind that posting under a screen name will not protect you.

"Anonymity’s cloak may be pierced by subpoena…

or a properly issued search warrant.

…It also may be lifted by the site administrator…"

http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/news/a43755/facebook-defamation-lawsuit/

etc.

I dont give two shits about your american law. Learn australian law please. Even if i were american i doubt your courts would give 1 single shit about your wuss ass crying over an internet post
The gamefaqs mods might support and enable you, but nobody in real life will


http://www.smh.com.au/national/investigations/free-speech-the-loser-in-australias-defamation-bonanza-20170511-gw2cnc.html

"Australia's punishing defamation laws have made Sydney the libel capital of the world, and people posting on Facebook and in blogs are the latest target for expensive legal action and threats.

But the number of matters reaching court are a small proportion of total writs served, with most cases settled in advance to avoid the cost of a trial."

"Sydney's role as "defamation capital" is "a matter of public record," said NSW Judge Judith Gibson, who compiles the details of all defamation cases in Australia for legal publication LexisNexis.

The Australian defamation law was passed in 2005, and to the end of last year, there were 72 trials in NSW compared to 21 in Queensland and 19 in Victoria, she wrote in Defamation Case Law Analysis and Statistics."

"Judge Gibson wrote that a growing problem was that "claims based on publications on the internet, emails and on social media, are now far more common than claims against traditional media defendants"

Leave the reading to me, and I will leave the useless trash talking to you.
(edited 1 day ago)report
Conflict posted...
How you gonna sue people on gamefaqs when you have literally no personal information about them


That is what an injunction would force a certain organization to hand over or risk contempt charges.
Rika_Furude posted...
He will never find me through 7 proxies


You don't use 7 proxies. You don't even know what a proxy is.
Delirious_Beard  attack on sight1 day ago#170
god this dude is one disturbing individual
http://i.imgur.com/5UL2v5u.gif
"Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you, too?"
LightningAce11 1 day ago#172
It's insane that dawkins would even consider suing people over message board posts.
"I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II
SlashmanSG 23 hours ago#173
LightningAce11 posted...
It's insane that dawkins would even consider suing people over message board posts.

For stating facts he alone made public.
kingdrake2 23 hours ago#174
LightningAce11 posted...
It's insane that dawkins would even consider suing people over message board posts.


that's only if you piss him off.
I'd hate to be that guy. he'll be dodging freak accidents for the rest of his life now. Final Destination rules - RickyTheBAWSE
SlashmanSG posted...
LightningAce11 posted...
It's insane that dawkins would even consider suing people over message board posts.

For stating facts he alone made public.


You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. Stick to the truth. That simple.
gnomefromnome 23 hours ago#176
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
SlashmanSG posted...
LightningAce11 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

For stating facts he alone made public.


You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

😅😅😅😅
Oh my God... That was the dumbest collection of dumbosity I've ever seen! - Famine
https://youtu.be/pOtTxMC1ZZQ
ClunkerSlim 22 hours ago#177
How is Dawkins going to prove damages when he doesn’t have a fucking job? Did me calling him a pedo cause his disability check from arriving?
SlashmanSG 22 hours ago#178
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
SlashmanSG posted...
LightningAce11 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

For stating facts he alone made public.


You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. Stick to the truth. That simple.

You have pending charges for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor. That's not an opinion.
SlashmanSG posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
SlashmanSG posted...
 show hidden quote(s)


You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. Stick to the truth. That simple.

You have pending charges for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor. That's not an opinion.


This statement is not the issue.

SlashmanSG posted...
MisterPorn posted...
Vyrulisse posted...
 show hidden quote(s)


Does he even pay child support? Judging from his videos it doesn't seem like he has a job.

The only job he seems to have is running away from child molestation charges.


Don't play stupid. Cut out the defamation. Simple as that.
(edited 22 hours ago)report
ClunkerSlim posted...
How is Dawkins going to prove damages when he doesn’t have a fucking job? Did me calling him a pedo cause his disability check from arriving?


In this post you need a job to prove damages. Holy false equivalence batman.
I wonder how Dawkins feels to be so universally disliked.
I'm sick of trolls and garbage posters
ImCallingYouOut posted...
I wonder how Dawkins feels to be so universally disliked.


I am liked by intelligent folks and hated by those who are ignorant in comparison. Likely due to envy. If most people are average at best then that tells you that the majority of people don't like me. This then means that I can filter my friends to only associate with those who are beneficial to my life. Sounds like a useful skill. You should try it.
my next question is: do you actually believe what you say or is it the typical troll bullshit?
I'm sick of trolls and garbage posters
ImCallingYouOut posted...
my next question is: do you actually believe what you say or is it the typical troll bullshit?


Depends. Most of what you think is trolling is serious and most of what you think is serious is trolling.
The Admiral 21 hours ago#185
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Likely due to envy.


Yeah, everyone wants to be a convicted felon with multiple additional outstanding felony charges, including one for possession of child pornography. It's what every parent dreams of for their child.
- The Admiral
iClockwork 21 hours ago#186
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
This then means that I can filter my friends to only associate with those who are beneficial to my life. Sounds like a useful skill. You should try it.

Yet here you are...
SlashmanSG 21 hours ago#187
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
I am liked by intelligent folks

You mean the homeless junkies you let live with you in your garage?
The Admiral posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Likely due to envy.


Yeah, everyone wants to be a convicted felon with multiple additional outstanding felony charges, including one for possession of child pornography. It's what every parent dreams of for their child.


Do you think Assange was guilty or that Hillary paid to have those allegations against him made up? Just curious.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/312654-wikileaks-threatens-cnn-with-defamation-suit-over-pedophilia-claim

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/cnn-apologizes-assange-commentator-calls-pedophile-article-1.2935083
(edited 21 hours ago)report
SlashmanSG posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
I am liked by intelligent folks

You mean the homeless junkies you let live with you in your garage?


This guy still thinks I live in a garage. I know I live in a house, these other people who have watched my videos know I live in the house. You think I live in a garage. Which one of us has delusion of grandeur again?
SlashmanSG 21 hours ago#190
HAHAHAHA the fuck does that have to do with anything? God you are the most pathetic clown I've ever even heard of.
iClockwork 21 hours ago#191
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Do you think Assange was guilty or that Hillary paid to have those allegations against him made up? Just curious. 

We're talking about your charges. Nice deflection, b...b...but Hillary!
iClockwork posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Do you think Assange was guilty or that Hillary paid to have those allegations against him made up? Just curious. 

We're talking about your charges. Nice deflection, b...b...but Hillary!


And I was talking to Admiral, not you. I have a point to the question but it is directed towards Admiral. You must really love me to spend all this time trying to troll me when I am not even talking to you. Almost every day you do this shit. Do you have any other hobbies?
(edited 21 hours ago)report
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
iClockwork posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

We're talking about your charges. Nice deflection, b...b...but Hillary!


And I was talking to Admiral, not you. I have a point to the question but it is directed towards Admiral. You must really love me to spend all this time trying to troll me when I am not even talking to you. Almost every day you do this shit. Do you have any other hobbies?

*posting on video game board*
* threatens said video game board members for defamation*
Nice hobby you got there
iClockwork 20 hours ago#194
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
And I was talking to Admiral

And i'm talking to you.

DawkinsNumber4 posted...
all this time trying to troll me

3 posts, "all this time."
Rika_Furude 20 hours ago#195
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

I dont give two shits about your american law. Learn australian law please. Even if i were american i doubt your courts would give 1 single shit about your wuss ass crying over an internet post
The gamefaqs mods might support and enable you, but nobody in real life will


http://www.smh.com.au/national/investigations/free-speech-the-loser-in-australias-defamation-bonanza-20170511-gw2cnc.html

"Australia's punishing defamation laws have made Sydney the libel capital of the world, and people posting on Facebook and in blogs are the latest target for expensive legal action and threats.

But the number of matters reaching court are a small proportion of total writs served, with most cases settled in advance to avoid the cost of a trial."

"Sydney's role as "defamation capital" is "a matter of public record," said NSW Judge Judith Gibson, who compiles the details of all defamation cases in Australia for legal publication LexisNexis.

The Australian defamation law was passed in 2005, and to the end of last year, there were 72 trials in NSW compared to 21 in Queensland and 19 in Victoria, she wrote in Defamation Case Law Analysis and Statistics."

"Judge Gibson wrote that a growing problem was that "claims based on publications on the internet, emails and on social media, are now far more common than claims against traditional media defendants"

Leave the reading to me, and I will leave the useless trash talking to you.

Again, truth isnt defamation. Your link is lol worthy
Posted with GameRaven 3.3
Rika_Furude 19 hours ago#196
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
He will never find me through 7 proxies


You don't use 7 proxies. You don't even know what a proxy is.

Unlike you i have a career. Unlike you i know a fair bit about IT. You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education. Wtf do you know?
Go smash your head against a cop car and bite them when they try to stop you or something like you usually do
Posted with GameRaven 3.3
(edited 19 hours ago)report
iClockwork posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
And I was talking to Admiral

And i'm talking to you.

DawkinsNumber4 posted...
all this time trying to troll me

3 posts, "all this time."


Because this is the first time you have ever posted about me in a thread.
Rika_Furude posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
 show hidden quote(s)


You don't use 7 proxies. You don't even know what a proxy is.

Unlike you i have a career. Unlike you i know a fair bit about IT. You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education. Wtf do you know?


I've been building and repairing my own computers since I was 7. I am 29. You also avoided admitting that you do not know what a proxy is other than you know it gives you the appearance of having an alternate IP address under a few limited scenarios. That's not even its main purpose.

Also, "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

EmXGSMU

rYPWBiQ
iClockwork 19 hours ago#199
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Because this is the first time you have ever posted about me in a thread.

The only time I post on this board is when i'm at work.

DawkinsNumber4 posted...
"You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

Not in
Education - Are you enrolled in a local college or university? No.
Employment - Are you currently employed? No.
Training - Are you currently being trained for employment? No.

Also directly from their website

A+ certification represents entry-level competency as a computer technician and is a vendor neutral certification that covers various technologies and operating systems. Expires in 3 years.


Yours was from 2006 and is no longer valid or accepted.
(edited 19 hours ago)report
Rika_Furude 18 hours ago#200
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
 show hidden quote(s)

Unlike you i have a career. Unlike you i know a fair bit about IT. You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education. Wtf do you know?


I've been building and repairing my own computers since I was 7. I am 29. You also avoided admitting that you do not know what a proxy is other than you know it gives you the appearance of having an alternate IP address under a few limited scenarios. That's not even its main purpose.

Also, "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

EmXGSMU

rYPWBiQ

oh wow, a certificate of participation and an expired beginner tier cert from over a decade ago. that certainly trumps a university degree and actual on the job experience. well done dawkins, well done.
(edited 18 hours ago)report
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Because this is the first time you have ever posted about me in a thread.

    The only time I post on this board is when i'm at work.

    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

    Not in
    Education - Are you enrolled in a local college or university? No.
    Employment - Are you currently employed? No.
    Training - Are you currently being trained for employment? No.

    Also directly from their website

    A+ certification represents entry-level competency as a computer technician and is a vendor neutral certification that covers various technologies and operating systems. Expires in 3 years.


    Yours was from 2006 and is no longer valid or accepted.


    Mine is good for life. It even has a verification code if you don't believe me.

    I also am a student I just don't give that information. I have a random ass video of me working last year for reference.


    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    Rika_Furude 18 hours ago#202
    #203
    (message deleted)
    iClockwork posted...
    Rika_Furude posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    no its not

    No it isn't


    https://help.comptia.org/hc/en-us/articles/115005364303-Good-for-Life-Certifications

    "If you earned a CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+ or CompTIA Security+ certification prior to January 1, 2011, the certification is considered good-for-life (GFL) and does not expire. If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam. You’ll then have two certifications – your GFL certification and your CE certification."
    Why do you people still try and argue like I am giving opinions? *smh*. Do I look like you guys?
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#206
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam. You’ll then have two certifications – your GFL certification and your CE certification."

    The GFL is meaningless.
    Rika_Furude 18 hours ago#207
    you could have a microsoft cert relating to server 2003 and it be "good for life" but that doesnt mean its relevant or accepted today because every business uses some combination of 2008-2016. your cert from 12 years ago is useless
    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    Rika_Furude 18 hours ago#208
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Why do you people still try and argue like I am giving opinions? *smh*. Do I look like you guys?

    no you look like a welfare leech (and, not surprisingly, you are one)
    Vyrulisse 18 hours ago#209
    Rika_Furude posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Why do you people still try and argue like I am giving opinions? *smh*. Do I look like you guys?

    no you look like a welfare leech (and, not surprisingly, you are one)

    No! He's a crusader for the constitution (which he doesn't understand) and everyone who feels oppressed by evil cops that ask us to leave and have the nerve to arrest people when they don't listen and make a huge scene.

    Wow that kinda got away from me there...
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam. You’ll then have two certifications – your GFL certification and your CE certification."

    The GFL is meaningless.


    Moving the goalpost.
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#211
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    The GFL is meaningless.


    Moving the goalpost.

    Its from your post. I highlighted the consequential fact and kept the goalposts secure.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    Vyrulisse posted...
    Rika_Furude posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    no you look like a welfare leech (and, not surprisingly, you are one)

    No! He's a crusader for the constitution (which he doesn't understand) and everyone who feels oppressed by evil cops that ask us to leave and have the nerve to arrest people when they don't listen and make a huge scene.

    Wow that kinda got away from me there...


    It is easy to say "I don't understand it" if you don't understand it so I understand because if you don't understand then you could never understand.
    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
     show hidden quote(s)


    Moving the goalpost.

    Its from your post.


    My post does not say that. I said mine was good for life. You said it was not. I proved it was. Now you changed it to "It's not good enough" but in fact it is and it is good for life just as I claimed. Your claim was refuted. Accept it and let it go.
    Funkydog  question him ALWAYS18 hours ago#214
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Vyrulisse posted...
    Rika_Furude posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    No! He's a crusader for the constitution (which he doesn't understand) and everyone who feels oppressed by evil cops that ask us to leave and have the nerve to arrest people when they don't listen and make a huge scene.

    Wow that kinda got away from me there...


    It is easy to say "I don't understand it" if you don't understand it so I understand because if you don't understand then you could never understand.

    But who can truly understand if no one understands? Understanding understanding is very hard to understand, do you understand?
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#215
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    "If you earned a CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+ or CompTIA Security+ certification prior to January 1, 2011, the certification is considered good-for-life (GFL) and does not expire. If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam. You’ll then have two certifications – your GFL certification and your CE certification."
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
     show hidden quote(s)


    Moving the goalpost.

    Its from your post. I highlighted the consequential fact and kept the goalposts secure.


    That's them trying to get money. Everyone knows anyone that got certified way back when is either A. going to keep up with everything or B. be able to keep up thanks to past experience. Anyways, I am not pursuing the career of computer repair. I just do it as a past time. That also doesn't say what you think it says. It is good for life. You can do the current test, and I could, if I want to pay 100 bucks for no reason.
    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    Its from your post. I highlighted the consequential fact and kept the goalposts secure.


    That's them trying to get money. Everyone knows anyone that got certified way back when is either A. going to keep up with everything or B. be able to keep up thanks to past experience. Anyways, I am not pursuing the career of computer repair. I just do it as a past time. That also doesn't say what you think it says. It is good for life. You can do the current test, and I could, if I want to pay 100 bucks for no reason.

    From what I understand, you’re not pursuing any career.
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#218
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    That's them trying to get money. Everyone knows anyone that got certified way back when is either A. going to keep up with everything or B. be able to keep up thanks to past experience. Anyways, I am not pursuing the career of computer repair. I just do it as a past time.

    No it's because new and better software is available that you are not certified in.

    Serious question, do you understand the concept that technology advances and the degree you held 12 years ago doesn't qualify you to use the current tech and how that makes your GFL obsolete?
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#219
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    That's them trying to get money. Everyone knows anyone that got certified way back when is either A. going to keep up with everything or B. be able to keep up thanks to past experience. Anyways, I am not pursuing the career of computer repair. I just do it as a past time. That also doesn't say what you think it says. It is good for life. You can do the current test, and I could, if I want to pay 100 bucks for no reason.

    Now whose moving the goalposts ROFL.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    Raptornado 18 hours ago#220
    Well, that explains why you don't understand that your functionally dead entry level certification is useless. You need CE certs to get actual jobs nowadays.
    Trust me.
    nome from gnome posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
     show hidden quote(s)


    That's them trying to get money. Everyone knows anyone that got certified way back when is either A. going to keep up with everything or B. be able to keep up thanks to past experience. Anyways, I am not pursuing the career of computer repair. I just do it as a past time. That also doesn't say what you think it says. It is good for life. You can do the current test, and I could, if I want to pay 100 bucks for no reason.

    From what I understand, you’re not pursuing any career.


    And you also don't understand a damn thing.
    iClockwork posted...
    No it's because new and better software is available that you are not certified in.

    Serious question, do you understand the concept that technology advances and the degree you held 12 years ago doesn't qualify you to use the current tech and how that makes your GFL obsolete?


    Number one, A+ has two parts. One is hardware and one is software. Number two, it's a certification, not a degree. You cannot even understand fundamental concepts so I am not sure how you can continue to sit here and try and debate with me.
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#223
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Number one, A+ has two parts. One is hardware and one is software. Number two, it's a certification, not a degree. You cannot even understand fundamental concepts so I am not sure how you can continue to sit here and try and debate with me.

    I misspoke, change degree to certificate and answer the question.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Number one, A+ has two parts. One is hardware and one is software. Number two, it's a certification, not a degree. You cannot even understand fundamental concepts so I am not sure how you can continue to sit here and try and debate with me.

    I misspoke, change degree to certificate and answer the question.


    There is no question. Just you talking about things you don't understand. By the way, when I went into my last college my good-for-life A+ certification still skipped the first 2 courses of my Computer Science degree and granted me the credits for having already have completed those courses. I see you also don't have much strength with regards to making inferences. See that video of me from my networking course? That course comes after the ones that are for the A+ certification so by default you can know someone who is enrolled as a CS major taking that course has already completed the two required for the A+.

    What does this mean? It means you should shut up.
    Raptornado 18 hours ago#225
    GFL certs don't even meet 8570 standards anymore, and those are some pretty low standards. You're bragging about a long-since useless entry level certification. In short, you're making yourself look more foolish than usual.
    Trust me.
    iClockwork 18 hours ago#226
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    What does this mean?

    That your certificate is worthless and you have zero skills. You are a NEET.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    Raptornado posted...
    GFL certs don't even meet 8570 standards anymore, and those are some pretty low standards. You're bragging about a long-since useless entry level certification. In short, you're making yourself look more foolish than usual.


    I am not bragging. I was just responding to his baseless claim with a direct refutation. The fact you don't even acknowledge that is indicative of an inherent bias and therefore you are not here to be reasonable you are here to be condescending and a waste of time.
    (edited 18 hours ago)report
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#228
    The difference between you and I is that I have an actual current CompTIA certification. I figured I'd impart some wisdom on you, since you're completely clueless on the subject.

    Your long since useless A+ certification will get you nowhere. My well maintained Security+ cert on the other hand actually meets basic standards. It's not much, but it's certainly much more than you've got.
    Trust me.
    Raptornado posted...
    The difference between you and I is that I have an actual current CompTIA certification. I figured I'd impart some wisdom on you, since you're completely clueless on the subject.

    Your long since useless A+ certification will get you nowhere. My well maintained Security+ cert on the other hand actually meets basic standards. It's not much, but it's certainly much more than you've got.


    What makes you think I don't have a security+ as well if I showed you that I took that class last year and had no issues with the tests involved? That document is not as readily accessible. Since you refused to read the past post let me assist you. I could update it, if I want to waste 100 dollars for no reason. Why would I? I am not dreaming of going into the low paying work of PC technician for geek squad. That is your dream maybe, not mine. That's why this was my accomplishment MORE THAN A DECADE AGO which was why I chose to display those credentials. I could refute his claim from shit from more than 10 years ago, never mind now lol.
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#230
    At least you admit that you got nothing.
    Trust me.
    iClockwork 17 hours ago#231
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    I could update it, if I want to waste 100 dollars for no reason. Why would I? I am not dreaming of going into the low paying work of PC technician for geek squad. That is your dream maybe, not mine. That's why this was my accomplishment MORE THAN A DECADE AGO

    So then why did you post the useless cert as evidence of your skill set.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    Raptornado posted...
    At least you admit that you got nothing.


    If you think I said that then either A. you can't read very well or B. you are being intentionally deceitful to try to be a wise ass.
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    I could update it, if I want to waste 100 dollars for no reason. Why would I? I am not dreaming of going into the low paying work of PC technician for geek squad. That is your dream maybe, not mine. That's why this was my accomplishment MORE THAN A DECADE AGO

    So then why did you post the cert as evidence of your skill set.


    Because proxies are mentioned in the A+ exam (mostly dealing with printer networking though) which I already had taken over a decade ago and it was directly relevant to the post I was attacking which I alleged the poster didn't even know what a proxy was and he had responded that he had experience (still didn't describe what a proxy was) and said I had none. I refuted that with the evidence that seemed most relevant and was most readily available.
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#234
    I'll impart more wisdom in you, given that unlike you, I actually AM Sec+ certified. They send you the .PDF file of said certification shortly after you earn it. They do the same when you renew it via continuing education. There is literally nothing about a Sec+ cert that's not readily accessible aside from PEBKAC errors on your part.

    Like I said, it's not much, but it's more than you can honestly claim to have.
    Trust me.
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    So then why did you post the cert as evidence of your skill set.


    Because proxies are mentioned in the A+ exam (mostly dealing with printer networking though) which I already had taken over a decade ago and it was directly relevant to the post I was attacking which I alleged the poster didn't even know what a proxy was and he had responded that he had experience (still didn't describe what a proxy was) and said I had none. I refuted that with the evidence that seemed most relevant and was most readily available.

    Taking a loss here is a good step. Keep it up.
    iClockwork 17 hours ago#236
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Also, "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

    No you posted it in response to being called a NEET. Posting an expired certificate only further hits the point home. Why would you provide contradictory evidence to the claim?
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    Rika_Furude 17 hours ago#237
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Also, "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

    No you posted it in response to being called a NEET. Posting an expired certificate only further hits the point home. Why would you provide contradictory evidence to the claim?

    because he thinks if he knows what a proxy is, then he "wins"
    a childish thought, but dawkins is a manchild after all
    Raptornado posted...
    I'll impart more wisdom in you, given that unlike you, I actually AM Sec+ certified. They send you the .PDF file of said certification shortly after you earn it. They do the same when you renew it via continuing education. There is literally nothing about a Sec+ cert that's not readily accessible aside from PEBKAC errors on your part.

    Like I said, it's not much, but it's more than you can honestly claim to have.


    I have that in my school e-mail and I have my A+ literally in my downloads folder. I am sorry you think you can say what is readily accessible or not but that's not how that works. You can try to act like you are more than you are but you are the one here bragging, not me. I was just refuting a claim. Successfully, I might add. You are tooting your own horn, wrongly, and based on your own arrogant misunderstandings.
    Rika_Furude posted...
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    No you posted it in response to being called a NEET. Posting an expired certificate only further hits the point home. Why would you provide contradictory evidence to the claim?

    because he thinks if he knows what a proxy is, then he "wins"
    a childish thought, but dawkins is a manchild after all


    Because if you were utilizing 7 proxies you would have to have the knowledge to know wtf a proxy is as to not have errors connecting them together. You still can't fucking say.
    iClockwork posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Also, "You are a NEET with no skillset, experience or education."

    No you posted it in response to being called a NEET. Posting an expired certificate only further hits the point home. Why would you provide contradictory evidence to the claim?


    "Posting an expired certificate"

    Either A. you are lying, B. you have poor comprehension, or C. you are trolling. It was proven that it is very much not expired.
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#241
    So as is obvious, you got nothing. You established that long ago. No need to keep covering the same ground.
    Trust me.
    iClockwork 17 hours ago#242
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Because if you were utilizing 7 proxies

    Just to save you from further fucking embarrassment.

    http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-luck-im-behind-7-proxies

    Imagine having a partial meltdown because you took a well known meme seriously.

    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    "Posting an expired certificate"

    Either A. you are lying, B. you have poor comprehension, or C. you are trolling. It was proven that it is very much not expired.

    Sorry, its GFL yet equally as worthless as an expired one.
    Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    Rika_Furude 17 hours ago#243
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Rika_Furude posted...
    iClockwork posted...
     show hidden quote(s)

    because he thinks if he knows what a proxy is, then he "wins"
    a childish thought, but dawkins is a manchild after all


    Because if you were utilizing 7 proxies you would have to have the knowledge to know wtf a proxy is as to not have errors connecting them together. You still can't fucking say.

    i was mocking your pathetic threats of legal action
    especially your ludicrous international legal threats and you claiming to know both american and australian law

    holy shit just give the fuck up, sit down, shut up. i'm not here to bring your IT skills up to date for employers in 2018 you NEET
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    Raptornado posted...
    So as is obvious, you got nothing. You established that long ago. No need to keep covering the same ground.


    I have refuted this so you can keep trying to toot your own horn but your intent here is obvious.
    Rika_Furude posted...
    DawkinsNumber4 posted...
    Rika_Furude posted...
     show hidden quote(s)


    Because if you were utilizing 7 proxies you would have to have the knowledge to know wtf a proxy is as to not have errors connecting them together. You still can't fucking say.

    i was mocking your pathetic threats of legal action
    especially your ludicrous international legal threats and you claiming to know both american and australian law

    holy shit just give the fuck up, sit down, shut up. i'm not here to bring your IT skills up to date for employers in 2018 you NEET


    You proved you don't even know what you are talking about as it pertains to your own country's laws too. I saw that. It was funny. Still won't tell me what a proxy is either. *smh*.
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#246
    PS: when you're too clueless to recognize the fact that CompTIA themselves say that the "good for life" certifications need to be made current through continuing education (and are by definition obsolete), then you really have no room questioning the reading comprehension of others.
    Trust me.
    Raptornado 17 hours ago#247
    But hey, I've maintained a cert for years, and am capable of both holding a job and being a functional member of society. What would I know, with all my actual practical experience and stuff? That can't hold a candle to your expired entry level cert and big bag of absolutely nothing.
    Trust me.
    Coffeebeanz 17 hours ago#248
    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved - Darwin
    Physician [Internal Medicine]
    LImES 17 hours ago#249
    On your "Schadenfreude" account you lied and denied about not being yourself (Dawkins/Xsquadder)

    So why should we believe you on certain things you keep denying?
    (edited 17 hours ago)report
    MrToothHasYou 17 hours ago#250
    I have a serious question for you all. Why do you guys keep dunking on this dude? Doesn’t he have some kind of legitimate mental disability? Like, what even are you doing you guys. This has to be wrong.
    http://weareontherun.bandcamp.com
    ^^^^^ HEY! ^^^ LISTEN! ^^^^^
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
      1. Boards
      2. Current Events
      3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
      Raptornado posted...
      PS: when you're too clueless to recognize the fact that CompTIA themselves say that the "good for life" certifications need to be made current through continuing education (and are by definition obsolete), then you really have no room questioning the reading comprehension of others.


      uilAdKm

      "when you're too clueless to recognize the fact that CompTIA themselves say that the "good for life" certifications need to be made current through continuing education"

      "CompTIA themselves say that the "good for life" certifications need to be made current"

      "need to be made current".

      Citation please.

      Before you prove that you are nothing but proverbial mouth and hubris - "If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam"

      "CompTIA themselves say that the "good for life" certifications need to be made current through continuing education"" - What GameFAQs Superman says

      https://help.comptia.org/hc/en-us/articles/115005364303-Good-for-Life-Certifications "If you earned a CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+ or CompTIA Security+ certification prior to January 1, 2011, the certification is considered good-for-life (GFL) and does not expire. If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam."

      What was that again?

      "If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam.""

      "If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current"

      "and are interested"
      (edited 17 hours ago)report
      Rika_Furude 17 hours ago#252
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
       show hidden quote(s)

      i was mocking your pathetic threats of legal action
      especially your ludicrous international legal threats and you claiming to know both american and australian law

      holy shit just give the fuck up, sit down, shut up. i'm not here to bring your IT skills up to date for employers in 2018 you NEET


      You proved you don't even know what you are talking about as it pertains to your own country's laws too. I saw that. It was funny. Still won't tell me what a proxy is either. *smh*.

      lmao you get more pathetic every post you make.

      no, xsquadder, you cannot sue me for making a post you dont like on the internet.
      no, i dont care about your feelings. no, nobody cares about your feelings.

      just give yourself up to the police and go to prison. maybe they will put you inside 7 cells
      Rika_Furude 17 hours ago#253
      Rika_Furude posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Citation please.

      common. fucking. sense.


      https://help.comptia.org/hc/en-us/articles/115005364303-Good-for-Life-Certifications

      "If you earned a CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+ or CompTIA Security+ certification prior to January 1, 2011, the certification is considered good-for-life (GFL)and does not expire. If you hold a GFL certification and are interested in bringing that certification current the only option is to pass the current version of the exam."
      Rika_Furude 17 hours ago#255
      employers don't care that it "doesn't expire"
      employers care that your cert is from 2006 and not relevant by todays standards
      how much more do we have to dumb this down so your "genius mind" will learn?
      (edited 17 hours ago)report
      iClockwork 17 hours ago#256
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      "and are interested"

      So your cert is worthless since you haven't updated it. Further proof you are a NEET.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Raptornado 17 hours ago#257
      If you had an ounce of reading comprehension, you'd realize that your obsolete entry level certificate is useless for pretty much everything. It's no longer current and no longer matters.

      But then nuance is not your strong suit, is it?
      Trust me.
      Rika_Furude posted...

      You are some child who lives in Australia. What do you know about American business?
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      "and are interested"

      So your cert is worthless since you haven't updated it. Further proof you are a NEET.


      "If you are interested" means "If you are interested". Your word omission cannot escape that fact.
      Raptornado posted...
      If you had an ounce of reading comprehension...


      Again. This is a direct refutation. Not "bragging". You likely will be butthurt and claim such though. asHRtdx
      (edited 16 hours ago)report
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#261
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...

      You are some child who lives in Australia. What do you know about American business?

      quite a lot more than you seeing as i'm educated and employed and you are not
      sure i may be younger than you but i've still accomplished more in life than you ever will. its pathetic you think thats an insult lmao
      (edited 16 hours ago)report
      Rika_Furude posted...

      You remind me of Trump. You try to sound smarter than you are but have predictable speech and tactics. You never answer questions asked if you don't know the answer you just change the topic or attack the person asking the question.
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#263
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
       show hidden quote(s)

      So your cert is worthless since you haven't updated it. Further proof you are a NEET.


      "If you are interested" means "If you are interested". Your word omission cannot escape that fact.

      And your certification being of no value further proves you have zero applicable workplace skills and are a NEET.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Coffeebeanz 16 hours ago#264
      For heaven's sake, you're unemployed and got kicked out of section eight housing. You don't exactly have a lot of good reasons to be so smug.
      Physician [Internal Medicine]
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#265
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...

      You remind me of Trump. You try to sound smarter than you are but have predictable speech and tactics. You never answer questions asked if you don't know the answer you just change the topic or attack the person asking the question.

      you dont get to say that until you get educated and get a job

      welfare leeches like you dont get to talk down on anyone
      Coffeebeanz 16 hours ago#266
      It legit makes me sad that medicine has made me feel like a totally incompetent buffoon, yet someone like Dawkins can have limitless self confidence.
      Physician [Internal Medicine]
      Vyrulisse 16 hours ago#267
      Coffeebeanz posted...
      It legit makes me sad that medicine has made me feel like a totally incompetent buffoon, yet someone like Dawkins can have limitless self confidence.

      Dawkins isn't smart enough to know that he doesn't know anything. It's enviable in a way.
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#268
      Vyrulisse posted...
      Coffeebeanz posted...
      It legit makes me sad that medicine has made me feel like a totally incompetent buffoon, yet someone like Dawkins can have limitless self confidence.

      Dawkins isn't smart enough to know that he doesn't know anything. It's enviable in a way.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Coffeebeanz 16 hours ago#269
      Vyrulisse posted...
      Coffeebeanz posted...
      It legit makes me sad that medicine has made me feel like a totally incompetent buffoon, yet someone like Dawkins can have limitless self confidence.

      Dawkins isn't smart enough to know that he doesn't know anything. It's enviable in a way.


      At least he's happy, in some totally illogical way. At this point, no amount of money or success will ever give my old, innocent life back. I couldn't even sleep last night because I got the flu from a patient, and I was already depressed when I was healthy.
      Physician [Internal Medicine]
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#270
      dawkins still hasnt shown how he can sue someone overseas because he doesnt like a post on the internet, lmao
      he hasn't even shown how he can sue someone locally
      Rika_Furude posted...
      dawkins still hasnt shown how he can sue someone overseas because he doesnt like a post on the internet, lmao
      he hasn't even shown how he can sue someone locally


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#272
      lmao, pathetic

      1) you dont know who i am
      2) you dont know your own laws
      3) you dont know my laws
      4) no way in fuck you are able to sue anyone, you will be laughed right out of court

      news articles and literal facts about you aren't harassment. grow up, manchild. get educated. get a job. get a life.

      btw, im behind 8 proxies now :)
      Funkydog  question him ALWAYS16 hours ago#273
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      dawkins still hasnt shown how he can sue someone overseas because he doesnt like a post on the internet, lmao
      he hasn't even shown how he can sue someone locally


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.

      The ultimate threat.
      Funkydog posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.

      The ultimate threat.


      Or they could threaten to make me move to Nebraska. That state is awful >_<

      Where the hell did you go @iClockwork ?
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#275
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.

      A name is needed before an international slander or libel lawsuit can proceed.


      There is absolutely no way that gamefaqs can provide an accurate name of any of its users.

      also, no one cares about your imaginary civil suits. You don't have the financial means to foreign counsel or to hire an attorney who is authorized to practice said foreign country.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      I is smart 16 hours ago#276
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      dawkins still hasnt shown how he can sue someone overseas because he doesnt like a post on the internet, lmao
      he hasn't even shown how he can sue someone locally


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.


      Just because it's possible to sue overseas doesn't mean you have a chance in hell of making it happen. I mean, you don't even have any upholdable reputation in the first place, let alone a good one. Second, even if you did have one, any court of law would laugh its ass off at your attempt to argue that posts on a message board somehow hurt it.
      Tah-rah-rah-boom-dee-aaay, did you get yours todaaay? I got mine yesterdaaay, that's why I walk this way.
      i.imgur.com/FoxGIbC.jpg
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#277
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Or they could threaten to make me move to Nebraska. That state is awful >_<

      Where the hell did you go @iClockwork ?

      Why would you move there? I agree it sounds awful.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.

      A name is needed before an international slander or libel lawsuit can proceed.


      There is absolutely no way that gamefaqs can provide an accurate name of any of its users.

      also, no one cares about your imaginary civil suits. You don't have the financial means to foreign counsel or to hire an attorney who is authorized to practice said foreign country.


      What are Nebraska's laws on the matter buddy? Grand Island have any local ordinances?
      (edited 16 hours ago)report
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#279
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
       show hidden quote(s)

       show hidden quote(s)


      There is absolutely no way that gamefaqs can provide an accurate name of any of its users.

      also, no one cares about your imaginary civil suits. You don't have the financial means to foreign counsel or to hire an attorney who is authorized to practice said foreign country.


      What are Nebraska's laws on the matter buddy? Grand Island have any local ordinances?

      irrelevant because i live in australia LOL
      and as if anybody has given their real name when signing up for this site lmao
      CM_Ponch 16 hours ago#280
      Why even come here Dawkins? What do you have to gain from staying on this board?
      SW-8316-3213-4720
      Rika_Furude posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      What are Nebraska's laws on the matter buddy? Grand Island have any local ordinances?

      irrelevant because i live in australia LOL
      and as if anybody has given their real name when signing up for this site lmao


      iClockwork lives in Nebraska dude. I wasn't talking to you. Are you him?
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#282
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
       show hidden quote(s)

       show hidden quote(s)


      There is absolutely no way that gamefaqs can provide an accurate name of any of its users.

      also, no one cares about your imaginary civil suits. You don't have the financial means to foreign counsel or to hire an attorney who is authorized to practice said foreign country.


      What are Nebraska's laws on the matter buddy? Grand Island have any local ordinances?

      No idea what NE state laws are. Go ahead and study up though they wont do much for ya ;)
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#283
      Where iClockwork lives is irrelevant.

      How about we discuss the matter of your obsolete cert, your certificate of participation, and the proxy issue? that was fun
      iClockwork 16 hours ago#284
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...


      iClockwork lives in Nebraska dude. I wasn't talking to you. Are you him?

      Must be that 2nd home I forgot about.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Rika_Furude posted...
      Where iClockwork lives is irrelevant.

      How about we discuss the matter of your obsolete cert, your certificate of participation, and the proxy issue? that was fun


      You admitted to being iClockwork a few posts ago. You are afraid because now I have something to identify you to subpoena you if I wish.
      (edited 16 hours ago)report
      Rika_Furude 16 hours ago#286
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      Where iClockwork lives is irrelevant.

      How about we discuss the matter of your obsolete cert, your certificate of participation, and the proxy issue? that was fun


      You admitted to being iClockwork a few posts ago. You are afraid because now I have something to identify you to subpoena you if I wish.

      lol?
      Rika_Furude posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      What are Nebraska's laws on the matter buddy? Grand Island have any local ordinances?

      irrelevant because i live in australia LOL
      and as if anybody has given their real name when signing up for this site lmao


      You literally answered for iClockwork here.
      Rika_Furude 15 hours ago#288
      Conflict  refugee love block me15 hours ago#289
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      dawkins still hasnt shown how he can sue someone overseas because he doesnt like a post on the internet, lmao
      he hasn't even shown how he can sue someone locally


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.


      You've "reported behavior to the Gamefaqs administration" many, many times only for nothing to happen. Spoilers: nothing is going to happen this time either.
      I want a 6ft amazon girl to uppercut my junk - SSJGrimReaper
      iClockwork 15 hours ago#290
      Rika_Furude posted...
      and that makes me iclockwork how?

      He's in full blown meltdown and is grasping.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Conflict posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/serving-an-international-defamation-subpoena/

      I would also stop bragging about imaginary anonymity you are using to facilitate harassment or I will be forced to report such behavior to the gamefaqs administration.


      You've "reported behavior to the Gamefaqs administration" many, many times only for nothing to happen. Spoilers: nothing is going to happen this time either.


      Normally I report GameFAQs staff to GameFAQs staff. I have a feeling they would rather me be on y'all's ass than theirs.
      (edited 15 hours ago)report
      iClockwork posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
      and that makes me iclockwork how?

      He's in full blown meltdown and is grasping.


      Talking to yourself now?
      Conflict  refugee love block me15 hours ago#293
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      Conflict posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      You've "reported behavior to the Gamefaqs administration" many, many times only for nothing to happen. Spoilers: nothing is going to happen this time either.


      Normally I report GameFAQs staff to GameFAQs staff. I have a feeling they would rather me be on y'all's ass than theirs.


      It doesn't matter

      You got laughed out of the building when you tried that. Just like you'd get laughed out of the building trying to sue people over message board posts on a website where people don't provide personal information. Tired of the "defamation"? You have two options. Stop acting like a complete clown, or leave the website.
      I want a 6ft amazon girl to uppercut my junk - SSJGrimReaper
      iClockwork 15 hours ago#294
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
      Rika_Furude posted...
       show hidden quote(s)

      He's in full blown meltdown and is grasping.


      Talking to yourself now?

      Nope it's funny watching you reach and reach.

      First im Hoth's alt, now i'm Rika's alt, let's put bets on who I am next.
      Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
      Rika_Furude 15 hours ago#295
      wait a second, i thought hoth was my alt...

      dawkins, have you been lying to us again?
      --Zero-  attack15 hours ago#296
      Rika you seem pretty defensive with the 8 proxys and the idea he will sue you over the internet. How come you engage with trolling him all this time? It's mind numbing reading his posts at times and you still are able to go back and forth with him lol. I want to know how he figures your alt is iclockwork
      SIGNATURE
      Rika_Furude 14 hours ago#297
      My trick is to read the first 5 words and respond based on that. I dont read anything else because it doesnt make sense

      Ive been doing nothing but laughing at his ridiculous idea that he thinks he can sue anyone, let alone me. Do you think he actually can, cause thats hillarious
      Posted with GameRaven 3.3
      (edited 14 hours ago)report
      gmanthebest 14 hours ago#298
      iClockwork posted...
      DawkinsNumber4 posted...
      iClockwork posted...
       show hidden quote(s)


      Talking to yourself now?

      Nope it's funny watching you reach and reach.

      First im Hoth's alt, now i'm Rika's alt, let's put bets on who I am next.

      I bet you're XciteMe's alt now.

      Placing 60,000,000,000 Double Dollars on it.
      What do I feel when I shoot an enemy? Recoil.
      thelovefist 14 hours ago#299
      I thought you were disabled Dawkins? Why do you care to argue over whatever your professional qualifications are when you're unemployable due to your disability?

      You also early claimed in this topic that everyone was 'jealous' of you while also claiming everyone was out to 'get you'.

      All of this is contradictory information.
      N/A
      LightningAce11 14 hours ago#300
      I love how dawkins claims to have beaten up rusty when it was him who was on the ground.
      "I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II
      1. Boards
      2. Current Events 
      3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
        1. Boards
        2. Current Events
        3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?
        --Zero-  attack14 hours ago#301
        Rika_Furude posted...
        My trick is to read the first 5 words and respond based on that. I dont read anything else because it doesnt make sense

        Ive been doing nothing but laughing at his ridiculous idea that he thinks he can sue anyone, let alone me. Do you think he actually can, cause thats hillarious


        I highly doubt he can lol.
        SIGNATURE
        Rika_Furude 14 hours ago#302
        thelovefist posted...
        I thought you were disabled Dawkins? Why do you care to argue over whatever your professional qualifications are when you're unemployable due to your disability?

        You also early claimed in this topic that everyone was 'jealous' of you while also claiming everyone was out to 'get you'.

        All of this is contradictory information.

        Forget his disability, he is unemployable due to criminal history, having no skillset, giant employment gap in his resume, and when you google search his name you find news articles relating to his crimes
        Posted with GameRaven 3.3
        iClockwork 14 hours ago#303
        --Zero- posted...
        Rika_Furude posted...
        My trick is to read the first 5 words and respond based on that. I dont read anything else because it doesnt make sense

        Ive been doing nothing but laughing at his ridiculous idea that he thinks he can sue anyone, let alone me. Do you think he actually can, cause thats hillarious


        I highly doubt he can lol.

        He can't. For him to Sue he would have to be able to prove who you are and file a lawsuit against your person. Even if Gamefaqs gave him your account information he has no way to prove that the information corresponds accurately with your person.

        If it was Facebook or a verified Twitter account it is different but there is no way for Gamefaqs to independently verify the accuracy of its users.
        Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
        thelovefist 14 hours ago#304
        LightningAce11 posted...
        I love how dawkins claims to have beaten up rusty when it was him who was on the ground.

        The dusty and rusty dust up where no one put their dukes up.
        N/A
        thelovefist 14 hours ago#305
        Rika_Furude posted...
        thelovefist posted...
        I thought you were disabled Dawkins? Why do you care to argue over whatever your professional qualifications are when you're unemployable due to your disability?

        You also early claimed in this topic that everyone was 'jealous' of you while also claiming everyone was out to 'get you'.

        All of this is contradictory information.

        Forget his disability, he is unemployable due to criminal history, having no skillset, giant employment gap in his resume, and when you google search his name you find news articles relating to his crimes

        Yes I understand that Rika. I am drawing attention to Dawkins' contradictory lines of thought i.e. why does he care about the particulars about why he is unemployable when he claims to be disabled.

        Shut the fuck up and let the grown ups speak here.
        N/A
        GOOMFalse 13 hours ago#306
        Imagine having all of your problems in life be your own fault
        I'm your huckleberry.
        Wasssup Now 13 hours ago#307
        Lol @ the GAMEFaqs message board lawsuit!!! Can anyone confirm if there's ever been an actually attempt? Ive been on these boards since the damn beginning and seen so many losers claim their going to sue. Curious if it's actually ever happened.
        thelovefist 13 hours ago#308
        Wasssup Now posted...
        Lol @ the GAMEFaqs message board lawsuit!!! Can anyone confirm if there's ever been an actually attempt? Ive been on these boards since the damn beginning and seen so many losers claim their going to sue. Curious if it's actually ever happened.

        Dawkins once threatened legal action when he called CBSi years ago over a moderation he received to his message board account he had at that time.
        N/A
        JustMyOpinion 13 hours ago#309
        So how is a circlejerk topic against Dawkins not harassment? How else did the TC think this topic would go?
        Voted best user on CE 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017
        Current e-argument streak: 11215 wins. 0 losses.
        Im_JustMe0129 13 hours ago#310
        Richard Dawkins got punched?
        About bloody time!!!!!!
        The Admiral 12 hours ago#311
        Wasssup Now posted...
        Lol @ the GAMEFaqs message board lawsuit!!! Can anyone confirm if there's ever been an actually attempt? Ive been on these boards since the damn beginning and seen so many losers claim their going to sue. Curious if it's actually ever happened.


        Dawkins is too poor to actually sue anyone over this kind of stupidity, but he'll still threaten and make a laughing stock of himself.
        - The Admiral
        Sparksfanboy 12 hours ago#312
        Dawkins vs. Rika Furude in a fist fight, who would win?
        Rika has his dukes up. He has his waifu body pillow with him. 
        Dawkins has to use one hand to record the fight on his phone crobat
        kingdrake2 12 hours ago#313
        Coffeebeanz posted...
        Vyrulisse posted...
        Coffeebeanz posted...
         show hidden quote(s)

        Dawkins isn't smart enough to know that he doesn't know anything. It's enviable in a way.


        At least he's happy, in some totally illogical way. At this point, no amount of money or success will ever give my old, innocent life back. I couldn't even sleep last night because I got the flu from a patient, and I was already depressed when I was healthy.


        if only one could keep away from the ill but that isn't possible :(. so sorry i get paranoid over anything of coughing/sneezing etc. which is why i try to stay away from others as much as possible.

        the flu could potentially kill me someday based on my health condition.
        I'd hate to be that guy. he'll be dodging freak accidents for the rest of his life now. Final Destination rules - RickyTheBAWSE
        (edited 12 hours ago)report
        SpoiltTrouser 11 hours ago#314
        Ugh, the way americans say t*** with an o sound. You lot deserve to be slapped.
        Gamer99z 10 hours ago#315
        Im_JustMe0129 posted...
        Richard Dawkins got punched?
        About bloody time!!!!!!

        I get that people think making this joke ITT is funny, but why would you want a 70-something year old man who's already had a stroke and shit to get punched because he doesn't like religion?
        "You need to lay off the peanut-butthurt and u-jelly sandwiches" - NeonOctopus
        The Admiral posted...
        Wasssup Now posted...
        Lol @ the GAMEFaqs message board lawsuit!!! Can anyone confirm if there's ever been an actually attempt? Ive been on these boards since the damn beginning and seen so many losers claim their going to sue. Curious if it's actually ever happened.


        Dawkins is too poor to actually sue anyone over this kind of stupidity, but he'll still threaten and make a laughing stock of himself.


        You don't need money to sue. It's called "indigent filing". Thank you for verifying your ignorance of the judicial system and lack of credibility to speak on it.
        thelovefist 9 hours ago#317
        DawkinsNumber4 posted...
        The Admiral posted...
        Wasssup Now posted...
         show hidden quote(s)


        Dawkins is too poor to actually sue anyone over this kind of stupidity, but he'll still threaten and make a laughing stock of himself.


        You don't need money to sue. It's called "indigent filing". Thank you for verifying your ignorance of the judicial system and lack of credibility to speak on it.

        That doesn't make you any less of a laughing stock fyi
        N/A
        iClockwork 9 hours ago#318
        DawkinsNumber4 posted...
        You don't need money to sue. It's called "indigent filing". Thank you for verifying your ignorance of the judicial system and lack of credibility to speak on it.

        Which isn't an obligation of any attorney and your laughing stock of a case won't have anybody take your case without an upfront payment.
        Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder
        AceWingsta 7 hours ago#319
        1. Boards
        2. Current Events
        3. Do you think Dawkins deserved to be punched?