This has been bothering me for a few years now. It just popped back into my head today because we rearranged the living room so I got to take a few hours to disassemble and then reassemble an LCD TV, HD Receiver / DVR, 5.1 Audio receiver, Xbox 360, PS3, PS2, Wii, cable modem, and a wireless router.
Needless to say, I was ankle deep in cables and cords for quite a while, and it got me thinking again. . .
Now, I remember when I was a kid, everything hooked up to everything else with a regular old coax cable. Stick it in, screw it on, done. Coax gave way to composite, and for a while S-Video provided the best picture quality money could buy. Trouble is, you now had 2 or 3 cords because your audio and video streams were on separate pieces of wire.
Well then this newfangled "720i and 480p" tech came along and people started installing speakers all over their dang living rooms, and suddenly, those old cables just couldn't cut it, they couldn't physically pipe enough information from one end to the other fast enough to do the job. So then Component cables became necessary, but a computer's VGA cables were better. After all, computer monitors had much higher resolution than any TV. And for audio you now had 6 channels of sound blazing through one of two SPDIF cables; an optical version, or an electric version that oddly enough, was called a coax cable.
720i turned into 720p and 1080 was hot on it's heels and analog Component cables gave way to digital HDMI and even the computer saw it's signals digitized as VGA turned into DVI which was also replaced by HDMI. And the best thing about HDMI? It married Audio and Video back into the same cable! 1 cable providing full 1920x1080 resolution images anywhere from 60 to 120 times per second ALONG WITH up to 9 individual channels of crisp, clear, digital audio. AMAZING!!
Now, my question:
Today I get 300 channels, 85 of them in HD complete with 5.1 audio; and I can actually receive to view or record not one but TWO of these channels at the same time. Not only that, but I've got internet service that can download half hour long HD clips of quality big-boy movies in less time than my 56k of 15 years ago could even have hoped to take in an 800x600 picture of the same quality entertainment.
Someone please explain to me how, with sooooooo many technological upgrades over the years, with devices that require sooooooooo much more information to be shuttled about sooooooo much more quickly than back in 1984. . . .
. . . . .all of this is pumped into my house through a single "put it in, screw it on" coax cable from the dark ages?!?!
I have NEVER been able to figure that out.
This blog is intended to [ARCHIVE] for all eternity. To also be used to report and reintroduce the idea of keeping the record available to as many people as possible. Comments that were "of the time".
March 22, 2011
February 23, 2011
Cloud Computing is Bad for You
The plan is is for Google to buy up all the servers in the world, keep them Exactly where they are, and continue on doing the exact same thing they are now. In 5 years windows will release a OS that is based on this cloud system, all the new computers will have this OS and as time passes everyone will switch over. Then in another 5 years they will slowly wean us off the internet and switch us to the internet 2.
At this point all of our data and our social lives are going to be kept on the "cloud" servers, where they have access to everything they would ever want or need from you without having to ask even a first time.
Google has already been caught in the act of handing over personal information to governments, and whats more there are alleged stories of them working in direct contact with the CIA. Also when you use google chrome every single keystroke is logged and sent to google. not just when you press enter, every single one. Do some packet sniffing as your typing in the address bar, i promise you it will knock you to the floor.
At the moment google is but a search engine for most of us. If they are so bold as to hand over information as of now. Why do you think things are going to change when all of our data is online?
They will be able to block us from our own files, edit and audit them, go through them at any time. The data on there servers are owned by them. just as the data on ours is owned by us. If all our computers become nothing but zombie access points...what are we going to do?
The government has been looking for a way to spy on all of us flawlessly, the media has been searching for a way to flawlessly enforce copyright laws. With cloud computing you can do all this an more.
Forget cloud computing.
Fuck google.
Im keeping my 5TB, thank you.
At this point all of our data and our social lives are going to be kept on the "cloud" servers, where they have access to everything they would ever want or need from you without having to ask even a first time.
Google has already been caught in the act of handing over personal information to governments, and whats more there are alleged stories of them working in direct contact with the CIA. Also when you use google chrome every single keystroke is logged and sent to google. not just when you press enter, every single one. Do some packet sniffing as your typing in the address bar, i promise you it will knock you to the floor.
At the moment google is but a search engine for most of us. If they are so bold as to hand over information as of now. Why do you think things are going to change when all of our data is online?
They will be able to block us from our own files, edit and audit them, go through them at any time. The data on there servers are owned by them. just as the data on ours is owned by us. If all our computers become nothing but zombie access points...what are we going to do?
The government has been looking for a way to spy on all of us flawlessly, the media has been searching for a way to flawlessly enforce copyright laws. With cloud computing you can do all this an more.
Forget cloud computing.
Fuck google.
Im keeping my 5TB, thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)