the originator came back to claim he wrote the CP

 Anonymous (ID: x9JfKl+e) 08/04/16(Thu)13:40:29 No.1423662▶

>>1423753 >>1424024 >>1424484

File: 1469826731029.png (784 KB, 899x899)

>>1422539 (OP)
It would have been a much more accurate movie if it had looked at all three sides of the issue instead of just focusing on the side liberals hate the most, focusing on the second side in passing, and completely ignoring the third side:

>1: Wall Street and the banks were greedy handing out the mortgages like candy and were also lying about their volatility
You saw the movie, you know all about this

>2: people who had no business getting mortgages and homes got them anyways
The movie showed the one dumb stripper who had five mortgages (for her her five homes, if I remember correctly?), and yes it's the banks fault for loaning her so much money, but it was also her fault for being dumb enough to borrow all of that money in the first place. Also the movie did focus briefly on those two real estate brokers who were dumb enough to give mortgages to anyone, but at the same time, the people taking out those mortgages should also be blamed for living above their means, which the movie didn't focus on and even defended poor people (and immigrants for some reason, not really relevant at all) even though it was very much their fault too

>3: the immense amount of pressure the government puts on the banks to give questionable people mortgages
The movie completely ignored this angle even though it's a huge reason why banks gave out so many garbage mortgages (and still do today). Yes the banks made shitloads of money on these shitty mortgages too, and that's why they didn't complain when the government made them do this, but the movie shouldn't have ignored the fact that the government wants poor people in homes they own for a variety of reasons even though they probably shouldn't

Truthers Get Him Mad

MrMallard 11 minutes ago#1 s*** like "Oh, this shooting death was a false flag to take our guns/take attention away from the government doing heinous s***". The worst are Sandy Hook truthers, who go around accusing victim's parents of being paid actors and saying that their children never existed/never died. Like you hear about this one guy who got mobbed by truthers, so he posted his son's birth and death certificates online to try to quell the conspiracy. When the hivemind deemed them forgeries, he went to reach out to the figurehead of the movement and show him the documents in person, talk about his dead son - and that turned into the figurehead demanding that the guy exhume his dead son to prove conclusively that Sandy Hook really happened. This f***face wanted this father to dig up his dead kid, to prove that the boy got murdered. Like... how detached from reality, how indifferent to the suffering of others do you have to be, to claim to a grieving parent that they're acting and that their dead child was a nonexistent pawn for the government to make some move on something? Do people crave to be the smartest guy in the room so much that they would spit in the face of a dead child's parent to prove their s***ry theory, to feel like they uncovered the real civil injustice and made the world a better place? I wouldn't doubt that CE had one or two truthers hanging around. I don't care, if you want to devalue lives to feel good about yourself, do it amongst yourselves without seeping your s***ty, godawful garbage through into the real world. But if you're on the level of these screwballs and contacting real people about staging deaths to destroy some garbage you hold dear, then I hope to God that you find a cause that f***s you in a big way and makes you rethink your entire life, because as it stands I wouldn't even consider you capable of making adult decisions for yourself or others. What the f***ing hell is wrong with these conspiracy dips***s. Jesus f***ing Christ. PSN: MrMallard19  http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1087-ducks-mallards-and-miscellaneous-poultry - MrMallard's duck board, have a chat!