It's either the hired super predators in action, or the deportation force.
In this case you have to blame the migrants.
Italy was receiving them with open arms and opened huge shelters where they received them with a pasta bowl.
The migrants got SUPER OFFENDED because it was pasta and not their traditional food and nearly rioted. It was pasta, not pork or something, and even if it was pork, aren't they supposed to be fleeing war and hunger and all that? You'd think their Imaginary friend would be ok with them eating just one time or something.
Another case was that they complained how the washrooms were dirty and some people peed in trash cans etc. And posted pictures in social media. They whined like "look how we are treated" and stuff like that. Thing is that they caused all that themselves. Only they use the washrooms, no one else. They were spotless before they arrived.
They were shown where the cleaning products are, because they simply didn't have enough staff working at there. They were told that if they need help and guidance how to clean washrooms all they have to do is ask.
Ask yourselves why flights in the middle east are so dirty.
Somebody used the bigot card and I simply provided context and showed it was not that.
And your example was flawed too. All of those particular refugees have the same common background, ideology and motivations.
It is more than just being ungrateful, they seem to not want to integrate at all, they dislike or perhaps hate western culture and they have no intention of following local laws (let's face it, someone who is supposedly fleeing war and famine and violence and is provided a safe, warm place to stay and pasta just doesn't go like "f*** your pasta where is my culture's traditional food you idiot?" If he wants to integrate and doesn't hold his new home country's culture in contempt).
The pasta thing was just an example. There is the case of the very nice French social worker who spent her own money to buy refugees soup in France and they mistook "lot date" for expiration date in the cans and said she was poisoning them. They proceeded to destroy all soup cans, screamed and made her cry.
There is the case of them ganging up and raiding trucks transporting food to the shelters.
There is the case of the pool incidents in Germany, DC etc etc. this isn't "isolated panhandler incident # 2"
I am still not saying "send them back", I am simply saying how stupid is to use the bigot card in this case.
When calling them racist or sexist doesn't work anymore, then we will accuse them of not liking the environment.
Same thing happened in Finland. They got pea soup (it tastes much better than it sounds) they declared that they will start hunger strike until they get an apology and real food. After the press left all the protesters started eating,
Instead they mess them up themselves and the whine how badly they are treated.
It is all staged lies to get into your head and bring down the boarder.
October 26, 2016
Father Kills Son
A man has been found guilty of killing his toddler son by force-feeding him a mixture of bread and cereal.
The three-year-old child “drowned in his food” after being made to lie across his father’s lap as the porridge-like was mixture poured into his mouth from a cup, the Old Bailey trial.
The 32-year-old father from north-west London, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was found guilty of manslaughter and cruelty to a child by majority verdicts.
The prosecutor, Simon Denison QC, said during the trial that the defendant would slap his son or send him to bed on occasions when he vomited during feeding.
On 27 November last year, the father called for an ambulance, and paramedics arrived to find the child lying on the floor in a nappy, showing no signs of life.
Denison said: “There was a very large amount of vomit that looked like a porridge substance on his face and on his chest and not the floor.
“It was very difficult to clear his airway because of the amount of porridge-like substance that was in his throat. When CPR was attempted, more of the substance came out.”
He continued: “A postmortem examination revealed that virtually all sections of his lungs were stuffed with recognizable food material. He had aspirated, inhaled, breathed in, a large amount of the porridge-like mix into his lungs so that he had, in effect, drowned in his food.”
The defendant was remanded in custody to be sentenced by Mr Justice Singh at the Old Bailey on Thursday.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)