2ylyt 13 hours ago#1
People have easily accepted Mario as a male, why can't they do the same for Link?
There's no point in justifying that Link is an avatar because he isn't. He has his own identity as a male elf. Moreover, he doesn't embody the player. Special snowflakes will find the smallest of loopholes to find their stupid "representation."
If you're willing to make an effort, anything can happen (I hope...)
|
Hirokey123 13 hours ago#2
Because Nintendo is being wishiwashi and won't just say Link is a defined character of his own. Instead they keep prancing around that he's supposed to be an insert for the player so they can imagine themselves in that role which is why they keep his character to the bare minimum. That's the difference, Mario is a character and Link is a player insert, and since not all players are male the excuse falls flat on its face.
You can't have it both ways you either build a player insert like a player insert, or you build a character like a defined character. When you get this wishi washi middle ground no one is fully happy because then they either have to deal with a character that has the personality of wood. Or they deal with a player insert that doesn't properly represent or feel like them at all.
I've got a quote that embodies you perfectly, but it's seventy-three posts long, has a few massive flowcharts, and lots of Xion-KMA to Me
(edited 13 hours ago)reportquote
|
2ylyt (Topic Creator)13 hours ago#3
Hirokey123 posted...
Because Nintendo is being wishiwashi and won't just say Link is a defined character of his own. Instead they keep prancing around that he's supposed to be an insert for the player so they can imagine themselves in that role which is why they keep his character to the bare minimum. That's the difference, Mario is a character and Link is a player insert, and since not all players are male the excuse falls flat on its face. This fact dooes not need to be confirmed to begin with. Mario is a character just like Link is. They both have their own name and designs. An avatar would be a conpletely or nearly blank slate. Just because Link hardly has any dialogue does not mean otherwise. Those who are aching for representation over a solid character need a major reality check.
If you're willing to make an effort, anything can happen (I hope...)
(edited 13 hours ago)
|
This blog is intended to [ARCHIVE] for all eternity. To also be used to report and reintroduce the idea of keeping the record available to as many people as possible. Comments that were "of the time".
January 16, 2017
January 15, 2017
Funny Bait Response
Chump ass nerd. I know what the f*** I said. I basically said, based on what you've presented to us, it is possible she finds you boring. That is possible to me because of your lame ass responses and lack of responding and how much you seem invested in the chick when you have no reason to be. Why? Because I've seen this scenario many times before. That may not what be what it is, but it could be. I didn't say you are boring, I said she might think you are. At the end of the day, what matters is what people think, because people behave based off of their percieved reality.
I haven't followed who is who, I don't remember who said what. I know more than anyone it is not always the mans fault, I didn't say or imply that it is. What I said was, your actions, are your fault. Regardless of how she behaved, you didn't have to do the stupid s*** you did. Regardless of how she is behaving, if you still care to speak to her, which you clearly do, then do it the right way instead of something blatantly stupid and then sitting worrying about if she'll respond. Maybe she'd do the same thing, you don't know that, but either way your performance in those specific instances was weak, and it is safe to assume that you've been doing that the whole time. Dumb ass nerd. You said that lame ass s*** about her family when a simple OK would suffice, don't talk to me like you know how to use your brain when you can't even form basic responses to simple s***. I'm actually being far more respectful than your dumb ass deserves. You should be thankful someone like me is giving you advice.
I haven't followed who is who, I don't remember who said what. I know more than anyone it is not always the mans fault, I didn't say or imply that it is. What I said was, your actions, are your fault. Regardless of how she behaved, you didn't have to do the stupid s*** you did. Regardless of how she is behaving, if you still care to speak to her, which you clearly do, then do it the right way instead of something blatantly stupid and then sitting worrying about if she'll respond. Maybe she'd do the same thing, you don't know that, but either way your performance in those specific instances was weak, and it is safe to assume that you've been doing that the whole time. Dumb ass nerd. You said that lame ass s*** about her family when a simple OK would suffice, don't talk to me like you know how to use your brain when you can't even form basic responses to simple s***. I'm actually being far more respectful than your dumb ass deserves. You should be thankful someone like me is giving you advice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)