...it was quite a disappointing movie. The first thing that stands about this movie is that Michael Richards isn't even in it...at all...much less a second identical character also played by Michael Richards who faces off against him. In fact, there were barely any appearances by the Seinfeld cast at all.
Okay, well that's fine. Kramer doesn't always have to be played by Michael Richards. Let's let somebody else have a turn. Right? Well, apparently not. So there I was sitting there waiting for Kramer to finally make his appearance, when suddenly during a dialogue scene I hear this lady's last name mentioned...and it's Kramer. What the fuck?
So I think to myself...no big deal. She must be the sister or something of Cosmo Kramer. They're building to it. That's what movies do. Well that's when I got disappointed even harder. Apparently the other Kramer isn't even Cosmo Kramer at all. It's her husband. And he's played by Dustin Hoffman, who obviously wouldn't have been a bad choice for Cosmo Kramer, but oh well I guess.
Turns out, this entire movie was about a child custody battle. And as funny as a premise as that could have been, there were like ZERO funny parts. How could the guy who played the main character in Rainman, one of the most hilarious movies of all time, be so unfunny in a movie about Seinfeld's next door neighbor? He didn't even trip while walking up the isles in the court room. He just cried about his son. I don't know, maybe I just don't get it?
This blog is intended to [ARCHIVE] for all eternity. To also be used to report and reintroduce the idea of keeping the record available to as many people as possible. Comments that were "of the time".
January 7, 2019
December 26, 2018
Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond
- Boards
- Current Events
- Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond.
The episode of Down The Rabbit Hole on Xsquadder is going to be a doozy
|
Sunhawk posted...
What does that mean? It means that Dustin actually outsmarted a Judge with his stupid voice changer and “my girlfriend did it” tactics. They drug him in for violating the court order on using social media and the Judge actually sided with Dustin and said there was no proof it was him. Basically, Dustin won.
END OF LINE
|
LittleScootaIoo posted...
Is his court and legal drama for real? Yes. This is 100% real and the court records are public
It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha."
https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv |
I can't wait to see what happens in season 4
|
BeyondWalls posted...
Sunhawk posted...What does that mean? Maybe the Judge just doesn't want the train wreck to end just yet.
Audio Theater: For discussion of podcasts, radio, audiobooks, and the like
https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1364- |
SmidgeIsntBack posted...
BeyondWalls posted...Sunhawk posted...show hidden quote(s) Damn CEmen judges.
Many Bothans died to bring you this post.
|
Laserion posted...
All they have to do is have P say it was her, and let them compare her voice, if it was really her. They're not going to spend that much money doing a voice analysis for something this minor.
I...I shall consume.
Consume...consume everything. ~ [FFRK] rcr6 - Chosen Traveler/Forbidden Power/Divine Veil Grimoire |
bover_87 posted...
Laserion posted...All they have to do is have P say it was her, and let them compare her voice, if it was really her. I meant just a normal by-ear comparison, nothing fancy like a police procedural show.
There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". |
They'd still have to call in an expert witness, which would be quite expensive. Just some rando saying it's the his voice isn't going to be enough if he used a voice modifier.
I...I shall consume.
Consume...consume everything. ~ [FFRK] rcr6 - Chosen Traveler/Forbidden Power/Divine Veil Grimoire |
- Boards
- Current Events
- Judge denies motion to revoke Dawkins' bond.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)