March 22, 2016

Fast Food Automation


i think one of the better arguments for robots in fast food is increased quality. which would improve sales. most human teenage workers slap some hastily put together crap together and usually use food thats been sitting out for hours at a time b/c they dont care or are too stoned to care. robots would be a huge improvement in the quality of the food which would make me want to actually eat at a fast food place again.

A) You've never worked fast food before or like worked anywhere ever it's obvious. (Tell everyone again how the fry cook is the easiest job in the restaurant)
B) When a robot messes up my order how do they correct it? Are they capable of recognizing mistakes much less correcting them? How will they deal with unruly customers? What if someone wants a custom order not on the menu? Can a robot make it? Oddly enough it's actually fairly common to have regulars that want their meals prepped a specific way. You wouldn't know this of course because you don't have a job.
C) How will these robots work with people who have food allergens?
D) When these robots inevitably break down what are you going to tell the customers?
E) Where are you going to pull the management from to work in these locations? Or are you deluding yourself into believing it'll be fully automated and it's "just around the corner"?

Face it, you haven't thought any of this through armchair anarchist. It's just a fantasy you and Mix often soil your undies over.

SPMcGuilicutty posted...
jrod916 posted...
The current wage is livable enough. You're not SUPPOSED to have a minimum wage job past a certain age and stage of your life, btw.

"You're not SUPPOSED to have enough money to live off if you get a job!" - A compassionate conservative, 2016


So, do you think a paperboy should be able to afford rent on a house?

No? What about a waiter? Cashier? Warehouse worker?

People pay money for SKILLS. If you have no skills, then your labor is worth approximately jack s***. Welcome to capitalism.

On topic, I think this is idiotic, though. You can't damage the low area of the economy without the mid level feeling it. If people have less money, then that is less people spending money on your products. It's a vicious cycle of self destruction.

Companies should be eligible for significant tax breaks for employing human workers, vice computerized ones. I'm all for efficiency, but moderation is always required.
---
"The only fool bigger than the person who knows it all is the person who argues with him."

Well I don't go to Carls as it is anymore. Greedy f***ers. Over $10 for some small combos now.
---
FFVII Remake: I'm cautiously optimistic but expecting a disaster.
Elbow Rocket!
Bond_543 posted...
i think one of the better arguments for robots in fast food is increased quality. which would improve sales. most human teenage workers slap some hastily put together crap together and usually use food thats been sitting out for hours at a time b/c they dont care or are too stoned to care. robots would be a huge improvement in the quality of the food which would make me want to actually eat at a fast food place again.


You dont leave your house much I can tell. Ive yet to use an automated machine and not have it f*** up 3 times out of 10. If you think these robots will make billions of "perfect" burgers and get everything right 100% of the time you are in for a surprise.

Complete Unreadable Misdirection1

it didnt make any sense. he wants a monopoly authority to provide him good quality services? how does he even measure if its good or not with nothing to compare it to? how does he even know its the best provided service with the most efficiency if its some monopoly that never changes? the author also fails to mention that their countries are basically living off their past inherited wealth. and are also leeching off the innovations from other countries that compete in services. its socialist services still use the world market prices as in indicator of them. if the whole world adopted these Nordic policies, they would run into the same calculation problems as all past failed socialism.

he wants to feel secure in the world by paying out the ass for high cost services instead of say putting it in a bank account and using it for free market services that would undoubtedly be cheaper and more plentiful and more innovative if the need ever came? again it didnt make sense and im having a hard time seeing the logic in it all. it also seemed contradictory. he claimed it for him then he claimed it was for providing for everyone. well which is it?

i also dont think the fact that there are going to invariably be successful business people in any country is any indication the nordic model produces great people. so it has successful businessmen... so? thats not b/c of the nordic model is probably b/c they inherited high I.Q.s. legos btw are expensive as hell. its only successful b/c they use govts of the world to enforce its monopoly by enforcing patents.