Rep. Ted Poe (R.-Texas), who served for 30 years as a Texas prosecutor and judge before being elected to Congress, introduced legislation last week designed to force President Barack Obama to deploy a minimum of 10,000 National Guard troops at the U.S. Mexico border for the specific purpose of patrolling the border and intercepting aliens and smugglers attempting to cross illegally into the United States.
The legislation would allow the president to deploy more than 10,000 National Guardsmen, but not fewer, and would leave the National Guard troops under the supervision of the governor in the border state where they are deployed.
“The president could put more than that, but he must put 10,000,” Poe told CNSNews.com. “The uniqueness of this is they would be paid by the federal government, because everybody says it is the responsibility of the federal government to protect the border. So the federal government will use the resources it already has to pay for those 10,000 National Guard troops, but they will be supervised by the governors of the four states on the border.”
all your post are really interesting
ReplyDeletesupporting you
take care.
Hell yeah they should!
ReplyDeleteThis seems like a great idea. Hope this goes through and the border finally get protected.
ReplyDeleteWow, very costly plan...there should be a better way to handle this issue. Perhaps make it a state issue instead? Since every state has their own unique needs and it shouldn't be EVERYONE's duty to protect the border.
ReplyDeleteInteresting!
ReplyDeleteGood lord, 10,000 troops, thats a bit overkill.
ReplyDeletehmmm... if the governor is easily bribe, this won't work at all. sure, the immigrants will decrease but the smuggling will continue.
ReplyDeletethat's a unique perspective on it!
ReplyDeleteSound like a good plan. Now, if only they can pull it off. They could have brought it down to a min. 5,000 troops. But who knows what'll happen. It IS a bit of an emergency. If those mexican gangs move too much farther north, then they'll be our problem.
ReplyDeletewow.. 10,000 troops ?
ReplyDeleteanyone else think this would be a bit of a logistical problem if two states disagree on how to use the guards stationed in their land. Just look at how AZ is handling immigration vs CA.
ReplyDeletethat's a lot of troops. I just don't want us to get sucked into mexicos drug war.
ReplyDeleteWhole bunch of political crap to be honest, people trying to control others and others just being slaves...
ReplyDeleteGreat lets waste even more money and funds on this 'problem'. Like the 3 billion dollar wall was not enough, lets waste even more money. If they stop immigrants then they will kill the American economy.
ReplyDeletehow much would this cost
ReplyDeleteBooooo....
ReplyDeleteThere is no such thing as an illegal person, only illegal borders. The working class have no country, people.
Stupid idea, since whoever pays for these additional national guardsmen should also be in charge of them. Congressman Poe probably just wants to blame the federal government for spending more money, while also getting the border protection he wants and controlled by who he wants.
ReplyDeleteFK YEA RAPE BORDER DEFENSE
ReplyDeletetoo bad the guy that introduced it is a republican...itll never pass
ReplyDeleteHehe oh well at least he can help out the Mexicans now too!
ReplyDeleteMesty =)
Not sure how which side of the fence im on with this one. Like my grandmother is an immigrant, but at the same time Southern California seems kind of flooded.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work!
ReplyDeleteSupp!
reinstate the draft. Then we'd have enough troops to protect the US/Mexico border, secure Iraqi oil fields, Afghan poppy fields and retroactively defeat the Soviets in Doc Brown's time machine.
ReplyDeleteWell well, let's see where this is going..
ReplyDeleteNot sure what to think about this... I guess it's a good thing
ReplyDelete10 000 x ≈70kg = 700 000kg of pure canon meat =)
ReplyDeleteinteresting as fuug
ReplyDeletelooking forward to more
mmawillgrow.blogspot.com
at least unexpected
ReplyDeletewasn't the fence enough?
ReplyDeleteAustralia... The Only Answer!
ReplyDeleteThat's a lot of peeps. I honestly didn't care about the whole border issue (I'm even a current Texan). But after really seeing what goes on there, it should be better protected.
ReplyDeleteone of the best blogs about politics i know
ReplyDeleteThat probably for good use
ReplyDeletewoah, nice
ReplyDeleteimpeach obama
ReplyDelete