- Boards
- Current Events
- Young Turds: Companies have 'all the right in the world' to issue false DMCAs
|
Because someone said something mean.
 |
|
They're psychos. I have those idiot's election night meltdown saved to my pc. I've watched it about a dozen times. Always great for a good laugh.
FFVII Remake: A disaster in the making.
I'll laugh at whatever I find funny whether you like it or not. |
|
They're like Trump. They take whatever position just as long as it helps their platform.
PSN: kazukifafner
|
Gavirulax
|
|
Can someone bulletpoint this whole story
Not all women deserve chivalry
http://i.giftrunk.com/rv4b2c.gif |
|
People still watch these genocide deniers? Lmaooo
I'm Gameofwheels. Not Gameofchills.
FC: 3196 5348 2859 PSN: Gameofwheels |
|
She's so hot
Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2
|
|
Here. Just because really. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever watched.
Like seeing vampires start to desperately panic because the sun is coming up and they have nowhere to hide. They had been so sure there was no such thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiWY0iRLV94&t=798s Love the music they added to it too. I have no idea why the video isn't embedding.
FFVII Remake: A disaster in the making.
I'll laugh at whatever I find funny whether you like it or not.
(edited 2 days ago)
|
|
ReignFury posted...
Can someone bulletpoint this whole story Firewatch Devs have an open statement saying youtubers can upload and monetize videos of their game Pewdiepie uploads a playthrough of Firewatch years ago Days ago, Pewdiepie plays a different game on Twitch, exclaims an opponent is an n-word Firewatch Devs decide they want no association with Pewdiepie, and decide to file DMCA takedown of his firewatch videos The issue is that technically, Pewdiepie had permission to upload the videos, so a DMCA against his videos would be in bad-faith.
All Hail
http://i.imgur.com/uzIx6Jp.gif |
|
EternalDivide posted...
Here. Just because really. It's the most beautiful thing I've ever watched. Damn, that white chick is so salty lol |
|
devilminion posted...
ReignFury posted...Can someone bulletpoint this whole story Is said permission at the devs discretion?
Not all women deserve chivalry
http://i.giftrunk.com/rv4b2c.gif |
|
Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm
Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives?
|
|
cjsdowg posted...
Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm That's not the issue. PewDiePie's actions and whether or not they are wrong or whatever is unrelated to whether or not it's okay to abuse copyright laws against him simply to express your disapproval. But obviously not thinking that copyright laws should be used abusively = defending racism because of the example that was chosen not by the people defending it, but by the abusers. |
|
ReignFury posted...
devilminion posted...ReignFury posted...Can someone bulletpoint this whole story Nope. It was a blanket statement giving everyone permission.
~http://www.firewatchgame.com/about/ What will likely end up happening from this situation, though, are devs starting to add caveats to their open-streaming/youtubing policies, outlining terms and conditions for uploading footage from their games (some already do, but typically it's just the bare-bones "yes, you can stream/monetize", as seen above)
All Hail
http://i.imgur.com/uzIx6Jp.gif |
|
Do the devs have the right to rescind?
Not all women deserve chivalry
http://i.giftrunk.com/rv4b2c.gif |
|
ReignFury posted...
Do the devs have the right to rescind? Rescission probably isn't even the right question to ask. That statement on the website is hardly a part of any kind of licensing agreement that would provide someone with rights that could be rescinded. I would be interested to see what the licensing agreement actually says. The DMCA gives the owners of the IP pretty broad discretion to limit the use by others. It's hard to imagine that a simple statement like the one linked to in this thread would change any of that.
************************************************
http://i.imgur.com/iZdWIKJ.jpg |
|
NibeIungsnarf posted...
cjsdowg posted...Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm Imagine responding seriously to cjsdowg
N/A
|
|
I thought that launching DMCA takedown requests was generally within their legal right because of how broad it was, but that you'd have to be a massive a****** to do it.
Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2
|
|
cjsdowg posted...
Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm Just saying, they're more political commentary than a "news outlet".
Do unto others what your parents did to you.
|
|
I think PewDiePie deserves all he gets, but the DMCA system is a mess. It's so easily abused for censorship.
This seems like a case of supporting something that's wrong just because it seemingly rights an injustice. You can bet that if it DMCA strikes were launched against TYT's videos/channel, they'd flip-flop instantly. I'm just waiting on someone doing that to teach them a lesson. To be fair though, they're correct that it's within people's rights to do it (and it shouldn't be IMO).
(edited 2 days ago)
|
|
I don't understand why people as big as PewdiePie still even rely on youtube anymore.
Do unto others what your parents did to you.
|
|
SpiralDrift posted...
I don't understand why people as big as PewdiePie still even rely on youtube anymore. Youtube is still a huge platform and even with the issues with ad revenue due to changes youtube makes with telling content creators they would still lose quite a bit of revenue not putting stuff up on youtube. Although a lot of content creators are also moving towards other ways to make money outside of youtube ad revenue. I've seen many youtube channels where they also have a patreon for people to donate money to help them create more videos. |
|
PSA: Young Turks are dogs*** bump
|
|
Smashingpmkns posted...
She's so hot ana kasparian is bae X 1000000
R.I.P. Bilbo-Swaggins: Victim of the CommunistFAQS Regime
|Brian-Dawkins|http://i.imgtc.com/5yil6xS.jpg. |
|
_OujiDoza_ posted...
Smashingpmkns posted...She's so hot I bet her vag gets all inflamed and moist whenever she has a meltdown on air. |
|
NibeIungsnarf posted...
_OujiDoza_ posted...Smashingpmkns posted...She's so hot Maaaaan don't get me started...
R.I.P. Bilbo-Swaggins: Victim of the CommunistFAQS Regime
|Brian-Dawkins|http://i.imgtc.com/5yil6xS.jpg. |
|
@EternalDivide posted...
I have no idea why the video isn't embedding. I know this was hours ago, but I think it is because you have it set to jump to a certain time instead of playing from the beginning. I don't think you can do that on this site.
"There's nothing gay about liking a nice feminine penis."
crazygamer21
(edited 1 day ago)
|
|
the young turks tend to be dumbasses so I usually take what they say and then assume the opposite is the smart choice
|
|
Zikten posted...
the young turks tend to be dumbasses so I usually take what they say and then assume the opposite is the smart choice That's the same approach I take with you! |
|
cjsdowg posted...
Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm
Fun fact: DC Comics is short for Detective Conan Comics
|
|
whitelytning posted...
ReignFury posted...Do the devs have the right to rescind? That makes more sense.
Not all women deserve chivalry
http://i.giftrunk.com/rv4b2c.gif |
|
Doubling down on their rhetoric, trying to frame criticism of their perspective as people disagreeing that Firewatch guys SHOULD issue a copyright strike.
 |
|
I hope they do try to DMCA him, it'll be hilarious watching Pew sue their arses.
|
|
ReignFury posted...
Doesn't matter. You can't allow someone to make content using your work, then when they make said content retroactively change your mind and declare it to infringe on your copyright. That's absolute nonsense. It's on par with saying "It's okay to arrest that man for sexual assault because he called me Poopface last week." That's not how law works. You can't just pretend people you don't like are guilty of crimes they never commited. You cannot let this become a precedent. The Young Turks here are being absolutely ridiclous
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
What do you expect from a channel named after a group of Turks that committed mass murder?
|
|
cjsdowg posted...
Yeah the people who hate a progressive news outlet also defending a guy who yelled out racial slurs at people. Hmmm People are "defending" him in the same vain that hopefully you would defend Donald Trump if he was arrested for causing WW1. Nothing to do with the person, they're attacking the notion of arresting people for bulls*** reasons over things they did not commit. You're confusing what you find immoral with what you find illegal. If a Muslim is morally offended by the fact you masturbate is it okay for him to support you being arrested for Grand Theft Auto simply because he doesn't like you? No it's not. That's not how society works, that's not how sanity works.
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
Newhopes posted...
What do you expect from a channel named after a group of Turks that committed mass murder? Sigless user logic. "The Young Turks" is a term that has popped up again and again just to mean a passionate group that disagrees with the current status quo. There have been like 6 political groups who called themselves the Young Turks
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
I'd never even heard of these Young Turk people. Are you they famous in America or something? Some people in this topic are talking like everybody knows who they are. But yeah, they didn't take Trump winning well.
It has been 0 days since something interesting happened.
A three hour tour, a three hour tour... |
|
EternalDivide posted...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiWY0iRLV94&t=798s I think Trump is a f***ing clown without value but this was comedy gold.
"Look, if I was good at math, I wouldn't be on CE at 2:00 the morning clicking on topics about porn stars ****ing horses." - May 2017, Dash_Harber
|
|
UnfairRepresent posted...
ReignFury posted... Isn't that how license agreements work though. After the contract is up any further use is a copy right infringement. In this case the contract being a weak verbal agreement.
we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em
|
|
They actually do
I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics.
http://i.imgtc.com/tHc3mIo.png http://i.imgtc.com/PYxw8Lm.png |
|
gamepimp12 posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...ReignFury posted... No. Thats not what further use means. They can say pewds can't make NEW content. Not that existing ones are invalid retroactively
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
Irony posted...
They actually do In the same sense you have the right to issue a noise complaint about an empty house. Or have the right to accuse Obama of masterminding WW1 It's just an idiotic waste of time and an awful precedent.
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
Those comparisons are terrible and it's not an idiotic waste of time if the person issuing them successfully has the vids taken down and them being an awful precedent is debatable.
I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics.
http://i.imgtc.com/tHc3mIo.png http://i.imgtc.com/PYxw8Lm.png |
|
deflection 101.
Dallas Cowboys : 1 - 0
Dallas Mavs : Dirk Nowitzki: 30, 005 points (6th all time) 1814 from Wilt |
|
Irony posted...
Those comparisons are terrible Except they are not. They are completely accurate. Abusing laws and systems to accuse someone of something they didn't do just to punish them because you don't like them. and it's not an idiotic waste of time if the person issuing them successfully has the vids taken down 1. They won't succeed in doing that. 2. It's still a waste of time either way and them being an awful precedent is debatable. In the hyper literal sense along with "murder and rape is bad" being 'debatable'. But no the argument of "It's okay to abuse laws and systems to harras people you don't like by accusing them of things they didn't do." is not debatable for anyone reasonable. Its utterly stupidly ridiclous. And if it was you or someone you cared about being accused you'd change your tune so fast you'd make scientists question the limit of the speed of light.
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg |
|
UnfairRepresent posted...
Newhopes posted...What do you expect from a channel named after a group of Turks that committed mass murder? Interesting, I didn't know this
~A little nonsense, now and then, is relished by the wisest men ~
TWSSted since~ 3/27/12 https://i.imgur.com/zlaENmx.png |
|
UnfairRepresent posted...
gamepimp12 posted...UnfairRepresent posted...ReignFury posted... I'm pretty sure I'm right here. Each further use referencing any views.
we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em
|
|
gamepimp12 posted...
Not at all. The work was created, it was transformed content and had permission. You can't retroactively change that 2 years later because of something said elsewhere. That's not how law works. Take it from a literal copyright attorney:  The law is actually pretty clear. You cannot just retract a licence whenever you feel like it. That is not how contracts and a licence is a form of contract, works. They could terminate the licence (possibly) so no future work can be made under the expired licence but any existing work would still be safe as it was produced under a valid licence. The company gave an implied licence (which is a real thing in law) and Pewds created content. You can't file for previous expressed licensed works which is what they are trying to do. The developer who is making the claim even flat out says he likes and supports streamers. Pewds saying a naughty word has nothing to do with copyright. Claiming he is violating copyright IS the same as me right now claiming you commited GTA because you called Laurence Fishburne a poophead and that upset me. That's now how law works. It's something we should challenge and mock loudly. A horrible and very stupid precedent.
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg
(edited 1 day ago)
|
- Boards
- Current Events
- Young Turds: Companies have 'all the right in the world' to issue false DMCAs
No comments:
Post a Comment
Public Comments