June 6, 2017

Youtube to demonetize violent video game montages and wrestling

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. Youtube to demonetize violent video game montages and wrestling.
MisterHandler 3 hours ago#1
_Raich_ 3 hours ago#2
Mernardi 3 hours ago#3
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.
Seek Sanctuary, and you shall find it.
giantblimpN7 3 hours ago#4
On_The_Edge 3 hours ago#5
This is so dumb to me. It's not market driven, it's ideologically driven. The advertisers are still willing to advertise on these channels. So youtube is just missing out on money.
We're here.
Gamer99z 3 hours ago#6
Mernardi posted...
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.
"You need to lay off the peanut-butthurt and u-jelly sandwiches" - Neon Octopus
chill02 3 hours ago#7
I mean, this is stupid, but not a free speech violation
Ave, true to Caesar.
s0nicfan 3 hours ago#8
It's not censorship. It's just bankrupting people who don't publish the types of videos you prefer until they all go away because you've forced them out of the market. Totally different.
"History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz
LightHawKnight 3 hours ago#9
And this is why a lot of people have been switching to other platforms like Twitch.
The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
"You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me."
ZombiePelican 3 hours ago#10
And this is all being done to pander to advertisers, it's absolutely disgusting. Youtube should be taking a stand for the sake of their creators instead of just bending over for advertisers who only want family friendly content 

People go to YouTube to see their creators not the advertisers
GAMER_X 3 hours ago#11
Youtube at this point is basically just saying "Hey twitch!! Hey vimeo!! Feel free to take all of our users and thus, all of our revenue!! Here's your big chance!!" 

Youtube has been going down an obnoxious orwellian slope for years and years, its just going to help other sites take all their talent
"Dragon Age 2 was a train wreck the entire game, ME3 was like screaming rollercoaster that ran out of track and everyone died." -nIMr0D888
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.

Censor: to examine in order to suppress (see suppress 2) or delete anything considered objectionable - censor the news; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable - censor out indecent passages

Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor
"i'm glad the guy who posted winter wrap up won it as that is definitively one of the best songs in the show" - Mecha Sonic
s0nicfan 3 hours ago#13
WilliamPorygon posted...
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.

Censor: to examine in order to suppress (see suppress 2) or delete anything considered objectionable - censor the news; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable - censor out indecent passages

Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor


That's where they're being tricky, though. They're not suppressing or deleting anything, as people are still free to upload those videos. However, with their revenue stream cut, it'll be far more difficult to justify putting in the effort, so the community of people who do so will naturally die out. Same result, but they can still claim the high ground.
"History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz
giantblimpN7 3 hours ago#14
But it's ok they advertise violent games ?
GOATTHlEF 3 hours ago#15
This sucks. I wish YouTube would grow up
The best way to get back on your feet is to get up off your ass.
hyperpowder 3 hours ago#16
Youtube is bound to lose its gameing community, Twitch is like leagues better for gamers. If they allowed video uploads like a series, game over for youtube.
Whoever beats my score I will give them a $10 PSN or Live card:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpiorAx40GY
Link HT 3 hours ago#17
It's not youtube's fault

Companies don't want their advertisements on certain types of videos, and that's completely fair because they're the ones paying for them. Youtube has to flag those videos otherwise they can't enforce this.
garan 3 hours ago#18
s0nicfan posted...
WilliamPorygon posted...
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.

Censor: to examine in order to suppress (see suppress 2) or delete anything considered objectionable - censor the news; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable -censor out indecent passages

Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor


That's where they're being tricky, though. They're not suppressing or deleting anything, as people are still free to upload those videos. However, with their revenue stream cut, it'll be far more difficult to justify putting in the effort, so the community of people who do so will naturally die out. Same result, but they can still claim the high ground.


Agreed. Its still defacto censorship.
Link HT posted...
It's not youtube's fault

Companies don't want their advertisements on certain types of videos, and that's completely fair because they're the ones paying for them. Youtube has to flag those videos otherwise they can't enforce this.


It is Youtube's fault. They are kissing the ass of the ad companies, but ignoring all the issues this causes with the creators. When there are no more creators, what will Youtube be?

Also the ad companies are stupid. So are the media covering it. I mean they raged about a video of a guy showing how stab proof vests are actually not stab proof.
The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
"You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me."
(edited 3 hours ago)reportquote
On_The_Edge 3 hours ago#20
Link HT posted...
It's not youtube's fault

Companies don't want their advertisements on certain types of videos, and that's completely fair because they're the ones paying for them. Youtube has to flag those videos otherwise they can't enforce this.

Lmao, no

IT's youtube's fault

There are plenty of companies that would have no problem advertising on those videos. Those who don't want to can have the option to opt out

Youtube is imposing its morality on the relationship between the content producers and the advertisers
We're here.
Daily reminder that Dailymotion exists.
chill02 3 hours ago#22
dailymotion had the best softcore stuff

oh well
Ave, true to Caesar.
PostCrisisJ2 3 hours ago#23
On the censorship, I suppose it depends on what you mean. It's not as if you can no longer post violent video game montages, you just won't be able get any money from them. You can argue that this a case for indirect censorship since it's discouraging people who make money from youtube to upload elsewhere to get revenue while those that don't bother with monetizing are unaffected.

Regardless this is a really stupid decision.
spritual powah will never die
Don't be shy to drop a PM to me, I'm always open for conversation.
PostCrisisJ2 posted...
Regardless this is a really stupid decision.

It's just a consequence of the really stupid internet advertising model.

Advertisers shotgun money and ads, and there's no telling where any given ad will appear or what any given ad on a site is going to be. Instead of researching site demographics or placing specific ads on specific URLs, the advertisers attempt to profile individuals and follow them from site to site, which inevitably leads to Trivago or someone inadvertently "sponsoring" a nazi skinhead site or gore videos or something.
(edited 3 hours ago)reportquote
SGT_Conti 3 hours ago#25
PostCrisisJ2 posted...
On the censorship, I suppose it depends on what you mean. It's not as if you can no longer post violent video game montages, you just won't be able get any money from them. You can argue that this a case for indirect censorship since it's discouraging people who make money from youtube to upload elsewhere to get revenue while those that don't bother with monetizing are unaffected.

Regardless this is a really stupid decision.

I think that sort of argument ends up being overly broad to be useless. You could group in negative criticism of media as some kind of censorship, because people will be deterred from spending money on things that review poorly, and thus shut down the creator's revenue stream and their motivation to create. 

Keeping it simple, where censorship is barring the creation or release of something, prevents it from reaching "boy who cried wolf" type of situation. I'm so sick of hearing censorship being called where there is none that I've started to tune out all those cries.
Posted with GameRaven 3.2
GiftedACIII 2 hours ago#26
I mean if you're going to demonetize "sexyiness" you should demonetize violent montages for consistency
</topic>
Mist_Turnips 2 hours ago#27
I don't get why people on this board try so hard to deny any instances of censorship. Though, I don't really care about this in general.
"Tomorrow's sunset will be beautiful. I have no evidence to support that claim though."
http://i.imgur.com/xi43OOH.jpg
Axiom 2 hours ago#28
Mist_Turnips posted...
I don't get why people on this board try so hard to deny any instances of censorship. Though, I don't really care about this in general.

No one is denying an instance of censorship. People are saying it literally isn't censorship and they're right
Behaviorism 2 hours ago#29
I get why idiots are against "violent video games"(yet have no problem with the latest Hollywood action flick showing up as an ad before a video), but why hate wrestling?
"Why is a picture of a woman standing on the left side necessary in an ad about high speed Internet and computers?" - xyphilia
(edited 2 hours ago)reportquote
Gamer99z posted...
Mernardi posted...
_Raich_ posted...
That's not what censoring means.
PostCrisisJ2 2 hours ago#31
SGT_Conti posted...
I think that sort of argument ends up being overly broad to be useless. You could group in negative criticism of media as some kind of censorship, because people will be deterred from spending money on things that review poorly, and thus shut down the creator's revenue stream and their motivation to create. 

Keeping it simple, where censorship is barring the creation or release of something, prevents it from reaching "boy who cried wolf" type of situation. I'm so sick of hearing censorship being called where there is none that I've started to tune out all those cries.


It's not an argument that I agree with, just something I could see someone saying. I do agree with you that the term gets too easily tossed around in a reactionary way.
spritual powah will never die
Don't be shy to drop a PM to me, I'm always open for conversation.
AugustAdoulin 2 hours ago#32
I cant wait to hear darksydephil b**** about this one.
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. Youtube to demonetize violent video game montages and wrestling.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Public Comments