May 3, 2017

People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer

  1. Boards
  2. Current Events 
  3. People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol
Samurontai 1 hour ago#1
That game series that has a mode called zombies lol

Because apparently female soldiers in a WW2 game is historically inaccurate, but zombies and ray guns are A-Ok.

By the way, that's ignoring the fact that the multiplayer mode of the game is not meant to be historically accurate to begin with.
Menardi 1 hour ago#2
Imagine getting mad about a COD game.
Samurontai 1 hour ago#3
Especially a specific game mode that has little basis in history, besides weapons (which are cross faction) and places.
This is why we need feminism tbh
For all your gaming pleasures: http://www.youtube.com/user/thismikeplaysgames
Currently Playing: Majora's Mask, Final Fantasy XIII, Shadow of Mordor
It also has them in the campaign. It harms its authenticity, in my opinion.
Allergic to bull****.
Edgemaster97 1 hour ago#6
Solid Sonic 1 hour ago#7
faizan_faizan posted...
It also has them in the campaign. It harms its authenticity, in my opinion.

I would agree.

Not only is it not enough to send us back to WW2 when I'm thoroughly done with it as a video game setting but they're using revisionist history.

If it took until the 2010s to accept women in the service at the frontline, it sure as hell wouldn't have been a thing in the 1940s.
People say "mixed reception" to damage control negativity.
iosifsvoboda 1 hour ago#8
But they did have female soldiers
^_^
Solid Sonic posted...
it sure as hell wouldn't have been a thing in the 1940s.


It was though. You're just dumb.
The irony is that the first console CoD (Finest Hour) had you playing as a female Russian sniper, so this is literally not the first time this has been done
You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet. Might wanna get on that, yeah?
Gojak_v3 1 hour ago#11
Broseph_Stalin posted...
Solid Sonic posted...
it sure as hell wouldn't have been a thing in the 1940s.


It was though. You're just dumb.


pot, kettle
chill02 1 hour ago#12
Samurontai posted...
That game series that has a mode called zombies lol

Because apparently female soldiers in a WW2 game is historically inaccurate, but zombies and ray guns are A-Ok.

By the way, that's ignoring the fact that the multiplayer mode of the game is not meant to be historically accurate to begin with.

People don't care about realism until it starts to harm their narrative.
Solid Sonic 1 hour ago#14
I refuse to do research on a subject I can just object to.
People say "mixed reception" to damage control negativity.
MB2012 1 hour ago#15
Solid Sonic posted...
faizan_faizan posted...
It also has them in the campaign. It harms its authenticity, in my opinion.

I would agree.

Not only is it not enough to send us back to WW2 when I'm thoroughly done with it as a video game setting but they're using revisionist history.

If it took until the 2010s to accept women in the service at the frontline, it sure as hell wouldn't have been a thing in the 1940s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_women_in_World_War_II
Yeet
Vertania 1 hour ago#16
Doesn't bother me that much for multiplayer, but it'd be f***ing stupid in campaign. The only way it would make sense to see a female combatant is if she's a medic who happens to pick up a gun or something. Or maybe a non-US army allowed female combatants, but I doubt it.
chill02 1 hour ago#17
Vertania posted...
Or maybe a non-US army allowed female combatants, but I doubt it.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roza_Shanina
Ave, true to Caesar.
Vertania posted...
Doesn't bother me that much for multiplayer, but it'd be f***ing stupid in campaign. The only way it would make sense to see a female combatant is if she's a medic who happens to pick up a gun or something. Or maybe a non-US army allowed female combatants, but I doubt it.


are you literate?
eston 1 hour ago#19
Fact: women and minorities didn't exist until 1964
eston posted...
Are COD games typically known for their historical accuracy?


There's never been an accurate WWII game. They're games.
chill02 1 hour ago#22
eston posted...
Are COD games typically known for their historical accuracy?


I mean, if they really wanted to complain about being historical accurate they'd be complaining about how you're given a bunch of automatic weapons that were stupidly rare instead of the much more common bolt action rifles
Ave, true to Caesar.
Edgemaster97 posted...
Who's mad?
"They say if you don't hide your belly button, lightning could take it away from you! What would happen if it did?"
http://i.imgur.com/G74y2NJ.png
metralo 1 hour ago#24
tfw women would be far more superior soldiers but the patriarchy keeps them from fighting

then again if we were in a matriarchy there wouldn't be any war lol
Veggeta_MAX 1 hour ago#25
No one said anything this b**** being in the Medal of Honor games.

http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Manon_Batiste
I'm Veggeta X's alt
FFBE ID: 196 912 851 900+ ATK Orlandu
Reminds me of

XBL/Steam/R*/Uplay: Barinade88 | Origin: Barinade | BattleNet: Barinade#11210
Roll Tide & Go Irish
CrimsonRage 1 hour ago#27
Edgemaster97 posted...
Who's mad?


You are.

Almost always.
Vertania 1 hour ago#28
Broseph_Stalin posted...
are you literate?

The topic was only up to post #9 when I started typing.
Vertania posted...
Broseph_Stalin posted...
are you literate?

The topic was only up to post #9 when I started typing.


Oh so you just wanted to give your opinion on a subject you know nothing about in true internet fashion.
Highwind07 1 hour ago#30
They have had female soldiers all the way from Ghosts.
thompsontalker7 posted...
The irony is that the first console CoD (Finest Hour) had you playing as a female Russian sniper, so this is literally not the first time this has been done

Was she actual military, or just a Resistance fighter?
If you are reading this chances are I am pooping.
Steelix500 1 hour ago#32
I'd have a problem if there are female combatants in the US Army and Wehrmacht. As far as I know there were none in WW2. 

I know the French Resistance and the Red Army had female combatants.
Edgemaster97 posted...
Who's mad?


Polygon, but it was their usual clickbait crap that they probably don't even believe in.
Vinesauce Joel's reaction to "7 GRAND DAD"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF-xdiL7Nr0
Steelix500 1 hour ago#34
TheSextMachine posted...
thompsontalker7 posted...
The irony is that the first console CoD (Finest Hour) had you playing as a female Russian sniper, so this is literally not the first time this has been done

Was she actual military, or just a Resistance fighter?

She was in the Red Army and I think her character was based off a real person too.
Vertania 58 minutes ago#35
Broseph_Stalin posted...
Oh so you just wanted to give your opinion on a subject you know nothing about in true internet fashion.

I did say "maybe a non-US army allowed" it. And the examples listed were Russian forces and a French resistance fighter.
Samurontai 58 minutes ago#36
Steelix500 posted...
I'd have a problem if there are female combatants in the US Army and Wehrmacht. As far as I know there were none in WW2. 

I know the French Resistance and the Red Army had female combatants.


Iirc, they were also in the Nazi German army, just weren't very numerous.

They were frequent in the Red Army (but again, not to an extreme)

To everyone saying "B...but there weren't any women who fought in WW2!" Kindly shut the f*** up and pick up a history book.
Vertania 57 minutes ago#37
Highwind07 posted...
They have had female soldiers all the way from Ghosts.

All games since Ghosts were in fictional settings though.
Samurontai 57 minutes ago#38
Vertania posted...
Broseph_Stalin posted...
Oh so you just wanted to give your opinion on a subject you know nothing about in true internet fashion.

I did say "maybe a non-US army allowed" it. And the examples listed were Russian forces and a French resistance fighter.


They were in the german army as well, as Auxiliaries in Paris, and were also used as guards in various concentration camps.
(edited 57 minutes ago)reportquote
The_Ivory_Man 56 minutes ago#39
I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat.

And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool.

And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer.

Having American soldiers as women would be stupid.

The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. 

Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.
"Just because someone is killed doesn't mean they died" - Shojikan
Broseph_Stalin 56 minutes ago#40
Vertania posted...
I did say "maybe a non-US army allowed" it.


You don't need maybe with a historical fact dude. Maybe pick up a history book before calling it f***ing stupid.
Samurontai 54 minutes ago#41
The_Ivory_Man posted...
I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat.

And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool.

And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer.

Having American soldiers as women would be stupid.

The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. 

Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.


There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.
weapon_d00d816 51 minutes ago#42
"There were women in combat in some factions in very sparse, specific instances so that means it's not historically inaccurate to see 50% of players choosing female characters".

K.
SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
Broseph_Stalin 50 minutes ago#43
when you think the topic can't get any dumber

weapon_d00d816 posted...
chill02 48 minutes ago#44
if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power
Ave, true to Caesar.
Vertania 48 minutes ago#45
Broseph_Stalin posted...
You don't need maybe with a historical fact dude. Maybe pick up a history book before calling it f***ing stupid.

I was picturing playing as a U.S. soldier and having female combatants fighting alongside. Which would be f***ing stupid. I should have been more specific.

Samurontai posted...
They were in the german army as well, as Auxiliaries in Paris, and were also used as guards in various concentration camps.

We probably won't see them in the game though. I really doubt CoD would have us play as any Axis characters and I get the feeling they'd be afraid of having us shoot females in the campaign too.
(edited 46 minutes ago)reportquote
Samurontai 45 minutes ago#46
weapon_d00d816 posted...
"There were women in combat in some factions in very sparse, specific instances so that means it's not historically inaccurate to see 50% of players choosing female characters".

K.


Nobody said this lmao

You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

chill02 posted...
if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


Exactly 

Vertania posted...
Broseph_Stalin posted...
You don't need maybe with a historical fact dude. Maybe pick up a history book before calling it f***ing stupid.

I was picturing playing as a U.S. soldier and having female combatants fighting alongside. Which would be f***ing stupid. I should have been more specific.

Samurontai posted...
They were in the german army as well, as Auxiliaries in Paris, and were also used as guards in various concentration camps.

We probably won't see them in the game though. I really doubt CoD would have us play as any Axis characters and I get the feeling they'd be afraid of having us shoot females in the campaign too.


Maybe, it'd be nice to see a change though.
thompsontalker7 43 minutes ago#47
TheSextMachine posted...
thompsontalker7 posted...
The irony is that the first console CoD (Finest Hour) had you playing as a female Russian sniper, so this is literally not the first time this has been done

Was she actual military, or just a Resistance fighter?


http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Tanya_Pavelovna

Resistance turned Red Army.
You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet. Might wanna get on that, yeah?
thompsontalker7 42 minutes ago#48
chill02 posted...
if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


The fact that the best gun in World At War was an uncommon submachine gun should say a lot
You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet. Might wanna get on that, yeah?
weapon_d00d816 40 minutes ago#49
Samurontai posted...
Nobody said this lmao

You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.
SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
Broseph_Stalin 39 minutes ago#50
weapon_d00d816 posted...
I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


yeah that's usually your problem
  1. Boards
  2. Current Events
  3. People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol
    Samurontai 38 minutes ago#51
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    Nobody said this lmao

    You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

    People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? 

    chill02 posted...
    if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


    This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.
    E32005 38 minutes ago#52
    Menardi posted...
    Imagine getting mad about a COD game.
    fenderbender321 38 minutes ago#53
    I like gender segregation in video games. When I play RPGs, my party is always all men if I can control it. I'd love to see more games that only have all men so that myself and many others like me can have a better gaming experience. And of course, there should be more game with just women so that women who are like me (but a woman) can have a better gaming experience with them.
    God bless you.
    Samurontai 37 minutes ago#54
    fenderbender321 posted...
    I like gender segregation in video games. When I play RPGs, my party is always all men if I can control it. I'd love to see more games that only have all men so that myself and many others like me can have a better gaming experience. And of course, there should be more game with just women so that women who are like me (but a woman) can have a better gaming experience with them.


    Nobody cares
    Go_Totodile 36 minutes ago#55
    It's not like it will affect their sales any and I honestly couldn't give less of a f***
    weapon_d00d816 35 minutes ago#56
    Broseph_Stalin posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    yeah that's usually your problem

    Extremely predictable post.
    SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
    chill02 35 minutes ago#57
    I mean, multiplayer modes will usually throw canon or historical accuracy out the window for the sake of fun

    There's nothing stopping you from having a lobby in Forza full of Pagani Zonda Cinques, even though literally only 5 of them exist and they're all in a showroom in Hong Kong

    now if it was a single player campaign full of American women fighting in the frontlines then I could understand the complaints, unless they're doing some alternate history thing like in Wolfenstein
    Ave, true to Caesar.
    (edited 33 minutes ago)reportquote
    The_Ivory_Man 34 minutes ago#58
    Samurontai posted...
    The_Ivory_Man posted...
    I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat.

    And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool.

    And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer.

    Having American soldiers as women would be stupid.

    The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. 

    Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.


    There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.


    There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well.

    It's a separate game mode.

    And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction?
    "Just because someone is killed doesn't mean they died" - Shojikan
    weapon_d00d816 33 minutes ago#59
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    Nobody said this lmao

    You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

    People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? 

    chill02 posted...
    if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


    This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.

    The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.
    SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
    Broseph_Stalin 32 minutes ago#60
    people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate

    like what little they think they know about history comes from video games

    amazing
    chill02 30 minutes ago#61
    But then the question is how many CoD players will pick female soldiers online, and I have no clue because I haven't played them. 

    All I know is Ghosts has them, so if you can find stats for that it should give you an idea, but my wild guess is that lobbies generally don't look like an Amazon brigade
    Ave, true to Caesar.
    Samurontai 29 minutes ago#62
    The_Ivory_Man posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    The_Ivory_Man posted...
    I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat.

    And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool.

    And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer.

    Having American soldiers as women would be stupid.

    The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. 

    Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.


    There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.


    There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well.

    It's a separate game mode.

    And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction?


    Zombies is a multiplayer game mode.

    You're trying too hard to find an argument where there isn't one
    Samurontai 27 minutes ago#63
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    Nobody said this lmao

    You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

    People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? 

    chill02 posted...
    if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


    This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.

    The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.


    Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. 


    Broseph_Stalin posted...
    people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate

    like what little they think they know about history comes from video games

    amazing


    Nobody said this. It's more historically accurate than the multiplayer is, which isn't supposed to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.
    SGT_Conti 23 minutes ago#64
    Samurontai posted...
    only a certain amount of snipers

    god bless
    "I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be."
    weapon_d00d816 21 minutes ago#65
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    Nobody said this lmao

    You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

    People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? 

    chill02 posted...
    if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


    This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.

    The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.


    Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry.


    I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time.

    It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither.
    SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
    Samurontai 17 minutes ago#66
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...
    Nobody said this lmao

    You're dumber than a f***ing rock sometimes I swear lol

    People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions.

    I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.


    Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? 

    chill02 posted...
    if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power


    This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.

    The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.


    Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry.


    I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time.

    It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither.


    1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around.

    2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.
    Maeiv 13 minutes ago#67
    I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left
    Achieve the dream
    76ers, Eagles
    fenderbender321 13 minutes ago#68
    Samurontai posted...
    fenderbender321 posted...
    I like gender segregation in video games. When I play RPGs, my party is always all men if I can control it. I'd love to see more games that only have all men so that myself and many others like me can have a better gaming experience. And of course, there should be more game with just women so that women who are like me (but a woman) can have a better gaming experience with them.


    Nobody cares


    And nobody cares that you think nobody cares. And before you say it, yes, I realize nobody cares that I pointed out that nobody cares that you said nobody cares.
    God bless you.
    weapon_d00d816 12 minutes ago#69
    Samurontai posted...

    1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around.

    2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.

    People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible.

    Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.
    SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
    (edited 12 minutes ago)reportquote
    Samurontai 9 minutes ago#70
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...

    1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around.

    2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.

    People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible.

    Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.


    The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well.

    You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. 

    Maeiv posted...
    I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left


    Pretty sure nobody would care though. You can literally stick a sword straight down the spine of female soldiers in For Honor.
    weapon_d00d816 1 minute ago#71
    Samurontai posted...
    weapon_d00d816 posted...
    Samurontai posted...

    1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around.

    2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.

    People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible.

    Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.


    The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well.

    You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. 

    They provide absolutely nothing to the gameplay.
    SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG
    eston 33 seconds ago#72
    1. Boards
    2. Current Events
    3. People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol

No comments:

Post a Comment

Public Comments